Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose reduction in dental radiography.

K Horner1, P N Hirschmann

  • 1Department of Oral Medicine, Turner Dental School, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK.

Journal of Dentistry
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An irretrievably biased sample.

British dental journal·2023
Same author

Nothing misleading.

British dental journal·2023
Same author

The dangers of toy magnets.

British dental journal·2022
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Use of Dental Radiography in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Journal of dental research·2020
Same author

Correction to: Diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2020
Same author

Diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2019
Same journal

Association of Toothbrushing, Dental Flossing, and Interdental Brushing with Stroke Risk.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Cervical critical dentin in non-carious cervical lesions: relationship with remaining dentin thickness and implications for restorative decision-making.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Periodontal and Prosthodontic Outcomes of Zirconia Single Crowns and FPDs with Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique: 10-Year Prospective Study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Pre-clinical evaluation of the anticaries effect of an experimental Malva sylvestris extract mouthwash using a cariogenic model in situ.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Five-Year Outcomes of Zirconia and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Cantilever Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Retainer Designs: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

ACCURACY OF 2D FACIAL PROFILE PHOTOGRAPHS UNDER ROUTINE CLINICAL CONDITIONS COMPARED WITH 3D IMAGING.

Journal of dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Minimizing radiation exposure in dental X-rays is crucial. Techniques like fast film, rectangular collimation, and advanced equipment significantly reduce patient and staff radiation doses in intraoral and panoramic radiography.

Area of Science:

  • Radiological Sciences
  • Medical Physics
  • Dental Imaging

Background:

  • Ionizing radiation in medical and dental imaging poses risks to patients and staff.
  • Minimizing radiation exposure is a standard practice, adhering to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle.
  • Effective dose limitation strategies are essential for safe diagnostic imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review methods for dose limitation in intraoral and panoramic radiography.
  • To evaluate the impact of these methods on diagnostic image quality.
  • To identify effective techniques for reducing radiation exposure in dental settings.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of dose reduction techniques in intraoral radiography, including film speed and collimation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of methods for dose reduction in panoramic radiography, such as X-ray unit type and filtration.
  • Assessment of the trade-offs between dose reduction and image quality.

    • Main Results:

    • In intraoral radiography, E-speed film and rectangular collimation reduce doses by approximately 50% and 60%, respectively.
    • Further dose reductions in intraoral radiography can be achieved with constant potential X-ray units, longer focus-to-skin distances, and rare-earth filtration.
    • Panoramic radiography doses can be reduced up to 87.5% by using constant potential units, rare-earth intensifying screens, and filtration.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing specific techniques can substantially lower radiation doses in dental radiography.
    • Combining multiple dose reduction strategies offers the greatest benefit for patient and staff safety.
    • These methods allow for effective radiation dose management without compromising essential diagnostic information.