Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.

R V Shannon1

  • 1House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2009
Same author

Sending sound to the brain.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2002
Same author

Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

Brainstem electronic implants for bilateral anacusis following surgical removal of cerebello pontine angle lesions.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2001
Same author

Effects of electrode location on speech recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2000
Same author

Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Ear and hearing·2000
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Forward masking in cochlear implant patients showed a linear decrease with signal delay. This suggests the masking mechanism is retrocochlear, aiding speech processor optimization.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cochlear Implant Technology
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Forward masking is a psychoacoustic phenomenon crucial for understanding auditory processing.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) bypass damaged cochlear hair cells, directly stimulating the auditory nerve.
  • The precise neural mechanisms underlying CI sound processing and their relation to normal hearing remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the characteristics of forward masking in patients with cochlear implants.
  • To compare psychophysical forward masking recovery functions in cochlear implant users to those with normal hearing.
  • To determine optimal signal processing strategies for cochlear implants based on forward masking measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Forward masking was measured in 12 patients using cochlear implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The relationship between masker-stimulus delay and the amount of masking (in microamps) was analyzed.
  • Normalized forward-masking recovery functions were generated and compared between patient groups.

    • Main Results:

    • A linear decrease in masking was observed as a function of the logarithm of signal delay.
    • Normalized forward-masking recovery functions in cochlear implant users closely resembled those of normal-hearing listeners.
    • This similarity suggests a retrocochlear (nerve-related) origin for psychophysical forward masking.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support mapping the logarithm of acoustic amplitude to microamps for improved forward masking in cochlear implant users.
    • Despite consistent masking patterns, individual speech processor performance varied significantly among patients.
    • Optimizing signal processing based on forward masking may enhance auditory perception in cochlear implant recipients.