The acute hemodynamic response to LV pacing within individual branches of the coronary sinus using a quadripolar lead

Anoop K Shetty1, Simon G Duckett, Ying Liang Ma

  • 1Guys and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust King's College London, London, UK. anoop.shetty@kcl.ac.uk

Insights

The acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to left ventricle (LV) pacing varies slightly within coronary sinus (CS) branches. However, the specific position within a CS branch is less critical than selecting the correct CS vein for optimal LV lead placement.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • Cardiac Pacing
  • Hemodynamics

Background:

  • The acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to left ventricle (LV) pacing via coronary sinus (CS) leads can vary.
  • Optimal LV lead placement is crucial for effective cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  • The impact of pacing within different regions of the same CS vein on AHR is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to left ventricle (LV) pacing at different sites within the coronary sinus (CS).
  • To determine if pacing location within individual CS branches significantly affects AHR.
  • To compare AHR across various pacing vectors and positions within the CS.

Main Methods:

  • An acute hemodynamic study was conducted in 20 patients undergoing LV lead implantation.
  • A Quartet LV lead with four electrodes was used to pace from multiple positions within CS branches.
  • Acute hemodynamic response was assessed using three bipolar configurations, comparing different vectors and positions within each patient.

Main Results:

  • Sixty-four pacing positions across 19 patients were analyzed.
  • No significant overall difference in AHR was observed between the three tested pacing vectors.
  • A small mean difference in AHR (+6.5%) was found between the lowest and highest dP/dt(max) across CS branch vectors.
  • A larger difference in AHR (+16.9%) was noted when comparing the highest and lowest values achieved using any vector in any position within the same patient.

Conclusions:

  • Pacing within different branches of the same coronary sinus (CS) yields a small difference in acute hemodynamic response (AHR).
  • The specific pacing site within a CS branch is less critical than the choice of the CS vein itself for LV lead placement.
  • These findings emphasize the importance of selecting the appropriate CS vein for optimal LV lead positioning and therapeutic effect.
Abstract