Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Expired CO2 Measurement in Intubated or Spontaneously Breathing Patients from the Emergency Department
Published on: January 29, 2011
A French hospital sentenced for unreasonable obstinacy
C Manaouil1, M Gignon, O Jardé
1Amiens University Hospital, Forensic and Medical Law Unit, France. manaouil.cecile@chu-amiens.fr
Abstract:
On 2 June 2009, the Nimes administrative court condemned the Hospital of Orange (France) for unreasonable obstinacy after neonatal resuscitation. On 14 December 2002, an apparently stillborn child was resuscitated after approximately 30 minutes of foetal distress. Cardiac activity was recovered, but the child has since suffered from severe disabilities. The court did not find any fault committed by the hospital regarding maternal care. However, the hospital was sentenced to compensate for the injuries caused by unreasonable obstinacy. According to the court, the medical team should have taken into account the harmful neurological consequences of prolonged foetal distress. The court did not condemn the act of resuscitation itself, but its excessive length. This court ruling serves as a basis for reflection regarding the limits by which unreasonable obstinacy should be set.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Torts II
Hospitals-I
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
