Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Cell-free Biochemical Fluorometric Enzymatic Assay for High-throughput Measurement of Lipid Peroxidation in High Density Lipoprotein
Published on: October 12, 2017
Usefulness of LDL-C-related parameters to predict cardiovascular risk and effect of pravastatin in mild-to-moderate
Kyoichi Mizuno1, Noriaki Nakaya, Tamio Teramoto
1Department of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. mizunok@nms.ac.jp
Insights
Non-HDL cholesterol and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio better predict cardiovascular disease risk and pravastatin efficacy in Japanese patients than LDL-C alone. These lipid parameters offer improved cardiovascular risk assessment for hypercholesterolemia management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Lipidology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of mortality globally.
- Accurate prediction of CVD risk is crucial for effective primary prevention strategies.
- Assessing the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies like pravastatin requires reliable predictive biomarkers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive ability of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
- To determine which lipid parameter best predicts the efficacy of pravastatin treatment in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolemia.
- To compare the predictive power of these lipid parameters against LDL-C alone.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale randomized primary prevention trial (MEGA Study) in Japan involving 7832 mild hypercholesterolemic patients.
- Patients were randomized to diet alone or diet plus pravastatin groups and followed for an average of 5 years.
- Comparative analysis of baseline lipid levels, CVD incidence, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves to assess predictive accuracy.
Main Results:
- Non-HDL-C and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio demonstrated significantly graded correlations with CVD incidence.
- Higher levels of non-HDL-C (> 186 mg/dL) and LDL-C/HDL-C (> 2.9) were associated with increased CVD events.
- LDL-C/HDL-C and non-HDL-C were found to be more predictive of CVD risk and pravastatin efficacy than LDL-C alone, reclassifying 32% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Non-HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C are superior predictors of CVD risk in Japanese individuals with mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolemia compared to LDL-C.
- These lipid parameters are more valuable for evaluating pravastatin's therapeutic effect.
- Independent interpretation of non-HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C is recommended for comprehensive CVD risk assessment.
Aim:
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the ratio of LDL-C to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; LDL-C/HDL-C), and non-HDL-C were evaluated to determine their ability to predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk with pravastatin treatment.
Methods:
We conducted a large-scale randomized primary prevention trial in Japan (MEGA Study), in which we randomly allocated 7832 mild hypercholesterolemic patients to diet alone (n= 3966) and diet plus pravastatin groups (n= 3866) and followed them for an average of 5 years. We compared baseline levels and the CVD incidence in the diet alone group, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves in the overall population. To determine the best parameter for predicting the efficacy of pravastatin, the diet plus pravastatin group was divided into tertiles to compare lipid parameters and CVD incidence versus the diet alone group.
Results:
Significantly graded correlations were found between CVD and LDL-C/HDL-C and non-HDL-C. Significantly more CVD events were associated with non-HDL-C [corrected] > 186 mg/dL and LDL-C/HDL-C > 2.9. Furthermore, LDL-C/HDL-C or non-HDL-C was more predictive than LDL-C. By measuring LDL-C/HDL-C or non-HDL-C, we allocated 32% of the diet plus pravastatin group into a different risk category. The lowest significant incidence of CVD was found in patients with LDL-C 119.8-133.4 mg/dL, LDL-C/HDL-C < 1.9, and non-HDL-C 145.2-160.8 mg/dL.
Conclusion:
Non-HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C have a greater ability to predict CVD risk in mild-to-moderate hypercholesterolemic Japanese individuals than LDL-C, and are more useful to evaluate the effect of pravastatin; however, these parameters should be interpreted independently when assessing CVD risk.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System III: Serum Lipid Profile
Serum lipids are fats and fatty substances in the blood and are crucial for various bodily functions, including energy storage, cellular structure, and hormone production. Serum lipids consist of cholesterol, triglycerides, and phospholipids.
Cholesterol is a soft, fat-like substance found in all body cells. It is crucial for producing hormones, vitamin D, and substances that aid...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Cholesterol: Significance and Regulation
Considering cholesterol and...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT