Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
Published on: June 23, 2023
[Effects of optokinetic stimulation on head movement and body sway of children]
1Department of Otolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto.
Insights
Optokinetic stimulation significantly increases head movement (HM) and body sway (BS) in both children and adults. Children
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Human Physiology
- Developmental Psychology
Context:
- Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) is crucial for visual-vestibular integration.
- Understanding age-related differences in OKS response is vital for developmental research.
Purpose:
- To investigate the impact of horizontal and vertical optokinetic stimulation on head movement (HM) and body sway (BS).
- To compare the effects of OKS on HM and BS in healthy children and adults.
Summary:
- Optokinetic stimulation significantly increased HM and BS in all participants.
- Children showed a greater increase in HM and BS area, with higher anteroposterior sway velocity compared to adults.
- The ratio of HM to BS was significantly higher in children, indicating greater susceptibility to OKS.
Impact:
- Findings highlight that children's HM and BS are more readily influenced by optokinetic stimulation.
- Suggests distinct visual-vestibular processing strategies between children and adults.
- Informs future research on sensory integration and motor control development.
Abstract:
We evaluated the effects of horizontal and vertical optokinetic stimulation on head movement (HM) and body sway (BS) in children and adults, using a Jung type optokinetic stimulator, a strain gauge-platform, and a encephalography. Twenty healthy children aged 7 to 9 years and twenty healthy adults aged 20 to 26 years were instructed to stand with feet close together on the platform with eyes open with and without optokinetic stimulation for 60 seconds. In all subjects, optokinetic stimulation significantly increased the total lengths of HM and BS. In addition, optokinetic stimulation significantly increased the areas of HM and BS in children, but not in adults. Although the ratio of the anteroposterior component to the lateral component in BS was significantly higher in children than in adults, the value of HM was not. Children exhibited a characteristic BS in which the anteroposterior swaying velocity was larger than the lateral swaying velocity. In the anteroposterior component, averaged divisional frequencies of BS were significantly larger in children than in adults. However, averaged divisional frequencies in the lateral component of BS and those in the anteroposterior and lateral components of HM did not differ between the two age groups. The ratio of the total length of HM to that of BS was significantly higher in children than in adults. These results suggest that HM and BS of children are readily affected by optokinetic stimulation, and that in children, the BS velocity in the anteroposterior direction is higher than that in the lateral direction.
More Related Videos
07:20Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025