Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The two faces of metallothionein in carcinogenesis: photoprotection against UVR-induced cancer and promotion of tumour survival.

Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology·2010
Same author

Online support to facilitate the reintegration of students with brain injury: trials and errors.

NeuroRehabilitation·2003
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Cut performance levels and testing.

Bill Bennett1, Jeff Moreland

  • 1Ansell Protective Products, USA.

Occupational Health & Safety (Waco, Tex.)
|December 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary

End users must test hand protection products for specific workplace applications, as manufacturers cannot guarantee suitability for every job. Glove performance ratings provide general guidance but require end-user validation for optimal safety.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Safety and Health
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Industrial Safety Equipment Association (ISEA) performance levels offer general guidance for hand protection.
  • Glove manufacturers possess expertise in glove properties but lack specific workplace hazard knowledge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of end-users in verifying hand protection suitability for specific applications.
  • To clarify the limitations of standardized performance ratings in diverse work environments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the relationship between standardized glove performance ratings (e.g., ISEA cut ratings) and real-world workplace demands.
  • Case examples illustrating how different glove types with similar ratings may perform differently in specific tasks.

Main Results:

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

  • Standardized ratings (e.g., ISEA Level 3 cut resistance) provide a baseline but do not guarantee protection for all tasks.
  • Glove selection requires consideration of specific workplace factors like grip requirements (e.g., oil resistance) beyond general performance metrics.

Conclusions:

  • The ultimate responsibility for ensuring adequate hand protection lies with the end-user through application-specific testing.
  • Collaboration between manufacturers and end-users is essential for selecting appropriate hand protection products that meet diverse workplace needs.