Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia01:11

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal anesthetics are given during lower abdomen and limb surgeries to block sensory and motor neurons. They are administered in the mid to low lumbar regions, primarily acting on the cauda equina's nerve roots. The blockade level depends on the local anesthetic (LA) concentration. Usually, low LA concentrations are sufficient to block sensory fibers, while only high LA concentrations block motor fibers. Other factors like injection volume and speed, the patient's posture, and the drug...
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions01:03

Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions

Nursing interventions are chosen as part of the planning process to achieve patient outcomes. Once nursing diagnoses are determined, the goals and outcomes are specified, then the nursing interventions are selected and individualized according to the patient's situation.
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome is...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia01:29

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia

Epidural anesthetics are administered in the fat-filled epidural space, the outermost part of the spinal canal. This technique is commonly employed for pain management and anesthesia during lower abdomen and pelvis surgeries or labor and delivery.
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Descriptive Analysis of Retrospective Observational Real-World Evidence of a Monoclonal Anti-Amyloid Therapy Program in a Wide Catchment Specialty Memory Clinic.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Virtual vs In-Person Neurologic Ambulatory Care: A Case-Control Study of Subsequent Health Care Utilization.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Dementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Basic Science and Pathogenesis.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Using prescription medication utilization trends to evaluate health system resilience and inform future emergency preparedness.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy·2025
Same author

Key Considerations for Assessing Real-World Comparative Effectiveness in the Context of the Drug Price Negotiation Program: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab.

PharmacoEconomics·2025
Same journal

Clinical and Radiological Characteristics Associated With Revision Anterior Surgery After Initial Posterior Decompression for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Time-to-Event Analysis.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same journal

3D-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial with Bone Mineral Density Stratification.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Postural Recovery After Lumbar Decompression: Cone of Economy Biomarkers of Balance Effort and Stability in Patients with Radiculopathy and Neurogenic Claudication.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same journal

Malnutrition and Adverse Outcomes after Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Value of Upright-Supine Imaging and Its Association with Postoperative Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis - A Two-Year PROM Based Comparison with Flexion Extension Radiographs.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
Same journal

Clinical Significance of Early MRI Assessment Following Separation Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
05:53

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery

Published on: August 17, 2022

Utilization characteristics of spinal interventions.

Zach I Abbott1, Kavita V Nair, Richard R Allen

  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Ave., Room 2507, Mail Stop F493, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society
|December 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A small group of physicians perform a disproportionately high number of interventional spine procedures. This pattern of high utilization by a minority of providers is consistent across all specialties, indicating significant overutilization by a few.

More Related Videos

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery
05:53

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery

Published on: August 17, 2022

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
08:34

Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Spine interventions and healthcare utilization analysis.
  • Medical economics and provider practice patterns.

Background:

  • Increasing rates of spinal injections noted in Veterans Affairs and Medicare populations.
  • Variations in spinal injection utilization by geography, specialty, and practice setting observed.
  • Medicare data shows a small physician group performs a large volume of injections; private insurance patterns are unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if a small number of providers account for a high percentage of interventional spine procedures in privately insured individuals.
  • To quantify any identified disproportionate utilization patterns.
  • To assess if provider specialty influences these utilization patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive analysis of utilization patterns from the Medstat MarketScan database (2003-2007).
  • Inclusion criteria: patients aged 18-99 receiving spinal interventional procedures (epidural steroid injections, facet blocks, etc.).
  • Analysis of nearly 200,000 patients and over 20,000 providers, examining procedure counts per provider and specialty.

Main Results:

  • The top 10% of providers performed 36.6% of all spinal procedures, with the top 20% performing 57.6%.
  • High-utilizing providers performed 9 times more procedures than low-utilizing providers and 4.5 times more than the median.
  • This pattern of disproportionate utilization by a few providers was consistent across all nine major specialties studied.

Conclusions:

  • A small subset of healthcare providers is responsible for a significantly high volume of interventional spine procedures.
  • This marked overutilization by a minority of providers is a dominant characteristic of utilization across all specialties.
  • Findings highlight potential areas for practice pattern review and resource allocation within interventional spine care.