Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intellectual Disability01:29

Intellectual Disability

Intellectual disability (ID) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning that manifest during the developmental period. This condition encompasses challenges in reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and learning, accompanied by impairments in everyday life skills, such as communication, self-care, and social interactions. Intellectual disability affects approximately 1% of the population in the United States, impacting an estimated 5...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Functionalism01:11

Functionalism

William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce were instrumental in founding functional psychology, which draws heavily from Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. This theory suggests that individual traits, including behaviors, are adapted to their environments through natural selection. At the heart of functionalism is the concept of adaptation, meaning that a trait enhances an individual's chances of survival and reproduction.
James envisioned psychology's role as...
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Becoming Speciesist: How Children and Adults Differ in Valuing Animals by Species and Cognitive Capacity.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Will Human-Animal Chimeras Cause Moral Confusion? Exploring Public Attitudes.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2025
Same author

Medical assistance in dying for mental illness: a complex intervention requiring a correspondingly complex evaluation approach: commentary, Malhi et al.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2024
Same author

Embodied Neural Systems Can Enable Iterative Investigations of Morally Relevant States.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

The selective deployment of AI in healthcare: An ethical algorithm for algorithms.

Bioethics·2024
Same author

Bioethics' Duty to Conference in Qatar: Reply to Magnus.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Disability: a welfarist approach.

Julian Savulescu1, Guy Kahane

  • 1Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford , Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT , UK.

Clinical Ethics
|December 6, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This paper introduces a welfarist approach to disability, defining it as a biological or psychological state impacting wellbeing within specific circumstances. This model differs from medical and social models by focusing on wellbeing and acknowledging environmental interactions without solely blaming social injustice.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
06:52

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit

Published on: September 30, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Disability Studies
  • Ethics

Background:

  • Traditional models of disability include the medical model (deviation from normal functioning) and the social model (harm from social prejudice).
  • These models have limitations in fully capturing the complex nature of disability and its impact on individual lives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and clarify a novel welfarist account of disability.
  • To differentiate this approach from existing medical and social models.
  • To demonstrate its utility in resolving ethical dilemmas concerning disability.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and philosophical argumentation.
  • Comparison and contrast with established disability models.
  • Application of the welfarist framework to ethical case studies.

Main Results:

  • Disability is defined as a biological or psychological state that diminishes a person's wellbeing in specific environmental contexts.
  • The welfarist approach integrates aspects of both medical and social models but offers a distinct perspective on harm and causation.
  • This framework provides a nuanced understanding of disability, moving beyond essentialism and solely societal explanations.

Conclusions:

  • The welfarist approach offers a more comprehensive understanding of disability by centering individual wellbeing and environmental interactions.
  • It addresses limitations of prior models and provides a valuable tool for ethical analysis in disability contexts.
  • Further exploration of the welfarist model can refine our understanding and treatment of disability in diverse societal settings.