Bitter taster status predicts susceptibility to vection-induced motion sickness and nausea

Sensitivity to bitter taste and susceptibility to nausea are both protective mechanisms that guard against toxin ingestion, and both these traits vary within and between populations. Thus, we postulated that they may have co-evolved, such that they are associated.

Bitter taster status was determined in 40 subjects (13 men, 27 women) by measuring the differential perceived taste intensity between salt and n-propylthiouracil using a labeled magnitude scale; susceptibility to vection-induced motion sickness and nausea was assessed using an optokinetic drum, a validated multi-symptom scoring scale, and electrogastrography.

Taster status distribution was 25% non-tasters (NT), 40% tasters (T), and 35% supertasters (ST). Gender had no impact on this distribution, but females had a higher mean maximum symptom score than males (12.4 ± 1.4 vs 7.3 ± 2.0). Non-tasters displayed a faster and larger increase in mean symptom scores, had a higher percentage of subjects with high maximum symptom scores, and had a higher mean maximum score than T or ST, (14.8 ± 2.6 vs 7.1 ± 1.8, vs 9.8 ± 2.0). Taster status did not affect the gastric myoelectric frequency response to vection.

Non-tasters are more susceptible to vection-induced motion sickness and nausea than T or ST, suggesting these two traits may have co-evolved in a reciprocal manner: in environments where the NT trait conferred an evolutionary advantage by enabling intake of fruits and vegetables containing bitter, yet beneficial, phytonutrients, increased nausea susceptibility may have arisen to maintain protection against ingested toxins.