Detection of pelvic inflammatory disease: development of an automated case-finding algorithm using administrative
Catherine L Satterwhite1, Onchee Yu, Marsha A Raebel
1Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E-02, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. col8@cdc.gov
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
|December 7, 2011
Summary
A new algorithm improves pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) identification from administrative data, offering higher accuracy than traditional ICD-9 codes alone for public health surveillance. This method enhances case finding for PID research.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Public Health Surveillance
- Health Informatics
Background:
- International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes are standard for identifying pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in administrative data.
- Current methods using ICD-9 codes alone may misclassify non-PID cases, impacting surveillance accuracy.
- Refining PID case identification is crucial for accurate disease monitoring and intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a case-finding algorithm to improve the accuracy of PID identification from administrative data.
- To compare the performance of the new algorithm against traditional ICD-9 code usage.
- To assess the algorithm's utility as a practical alternative to manual medical record review.
Main Methods:
- A classification and regression tree analysis was employed to develop the algorithm using data from Group Health (GH).
- Potential PID cases were identified in women aged 15-44 years at GH and Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO).
- Algorithm validation was performed at KPCO, with medical record review used for verification.
Main Results:
- The positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-9 codes alone for identifying clinical PID was 79%.
- The developed algorithm identified PID-appropriate treatment and younger age (15-25 years) as key predictors.
- The algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity (GH: 96.4%, KPCO: 90.3%) and PPV (GH: 86.9%, KPCO: 84.5%), though specificity was low (GH: 45.9%, KPCO: 37.0%).
Conclusions:
- The case-finding algorithm significantly enhances PID identification accuracy compared to using ICD-9 codes alone.
- The algorithm provides a practical and effective alternative to extensive medical record review for PID surveillance.
- Further refinement may be needed to improve the specificity of the algorithm for clinical PID case identification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...


