Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural Patterns Reveal Lateral Occipital Complex Representation of Ensemble Mean Orientation.

eNeuro·2026
Same author

Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception: 3 stimulus variables and 3 presentation modes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

Perceptual history biases in serial ensemble representation.

Journal of vision·2023
Same author

High-level visual search in children with autism.

Journal of vision·2022
Same author

Introduction to the special issue on ensemble perception.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

Perceiving ensemble statistics of novel image sets.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same journal

Role of AQP4 in ameliorating heat stress-induced cellular injury in a cell line model through active heat acclimation.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: Cognitive state monitoring for neuroadaptive information visualization.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The synthetic self-hypothesis: dopaminergic redirection through self-face recognition in stuttering therapy.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same journal

A randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of <i>Ginkgo biloba</i> extract EGb 761<sup>®</sup> in cognitive impairment associated with post COVID-19 syndrome-the EGb COCOS protocol.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Examining the independent and combined effects of autistic and ADHD traits on multisensory integration.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Prediction of hormone receptor status in breast cancer brain metastases using an MRI-based multimodal deep learning framework.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

High-level binocular rivalry effects.

Michal Wolf1, Shaul Hochstein

  • 1Neurobiology Department, Institute of Life Sciences, Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|December 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Binocular rivalry (BR) involves the brain’s inability to merge differing visual inputs from each eye. New research indicates that high-level cognitive factors, such as semantic content and context, significantly influence the BR mechanism, suggesting a higher cortical involvement.

Keywords:
binocularbinocular rivalryconsciousnesscortical levelmonocularperceptionsemanticsutrocular

More Related Videos

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry (BR) is a phenomenon where the brain cannot fuse dissimilar visual inputs from the two eyes.
  • An ongoing debate exists regarding whether the neural mechanisms underlying BR operate at low-level or high-level cortical processing stages.
  • Previous evidence presents conflicting findings from physiological studies (single-cell recordings and fMRI) concerning the cortical levels involved in conscious perception during BR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cortical locus of the binocular rivalry (BR) switch.
  • To determine if high-level cognitive manipulations, such as semantic content and context, influence BR.
  • To provide evidence supporting either a low-level or high-level mechanism controlling BR.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on binocular rivalry (BR) mechanisms, considering both low-level and high-level attributes.
  • Presentation of new experimental data manipulating stimulus semantic content and high-level characteristics to probe the BR switch.
  • Experiment I: Measured rivalry durations with words versus non-words presented to different eyes.
  • Experiment II: Compared dominance durations for line drawings of impossible versus possible figures.
  • Experiment III: Assessed the impact of idiomatic context on word rivalry.

Main Results:

  • Stimuli with higher-level semantic content and contextual relevance exhibited significantly longer dominance durations during binocular rivalry (BR).
  • Non-words, structurally impossible figures, and words in idiomatic contexts showed prolonged periods of perceptual dominance compared to their counterparts.
  • These findings indicate that manipulations at higher cortical levels directly affect the BR perceptual switch.

Conclusions:

  • Binocular rivalry (BR) is demonstrably influenced by high-level cognitive processes.
  • The results strongly suggest that BR is, at least in part, controlled by a high-level cortical mechanism.
  • Future research should focus on the interplay between low-level visual processing and high-level cognitive control in BR.