Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When to copy or avoid an opponent's strategy.

S A Frank1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|July 9, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new measure for end of life planning, preparation, and preferences in Huntington disease: HDQLIFE end of life planning.

Journal of neurology·2017
Same author

The development of a new computer adaptive test to evaluate chorea in Huntington disease: HDQLIFE Chorea.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2016
Same author

Generative models versus underlying symmetries to explain biological pattern.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Natural selection. VII. History and interpretation of kin selection theory.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2013
Same author

Natural selection. VI. Partitioning the information in fitness and characters by path analysis.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2013
Same author

Natural selection. V. How to read the fundamental equations of evolutionary change in terms of information theory.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2012
Same journal

Evolution of quantitative traits: exploring the ecological, social and genetic bases of adaptive polymorphism.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

The male-biased sex ratio in humans and its role in the transition from promiscuity to pair bonding.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the counter-intuitive effects of vaccination by coupling the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and the evolution of human behaviors.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A hybrid reaction-diffusion and mechanical stimulus model for mandibular bone remodeling under chewing and vibratory loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

This study analyzes two-player games where contestants aim to maximize market share. Optimal strategies involve either copying/avoiding opponents or diversifying/concentrating investments based on unpredictable returns and varying risk tolerances.

Area of Science:

  • Game Theory
  • Decision Science
  • Resource Allocation

Background:

  • Contestants in competitive environments often aim to maximize relative success, such as market share.
  • Resource allocation among various investment strategies is a key decision for maximizing gains.
  • Unpredictable payoffs and varying rates of return introduce complexity into strategic decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model and analyze two-player games where the objective is to maximize relative success (market share).
  • To investigate how contestants should allocate resources among investment strategies under conditions of uncertainty.
  • To determine optimal strategies based on opponent's behavior and risk-return profiles.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two-player game models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mathematical modeling of resource allocation among investment strategies.
  • Examination of expected rates of return and unpredictable payoffs.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimal strategies can involve mimicking or contrasting an opponent's resource allocation.
    • Diversifying investments across strategies may be optimal to minimize return variance.
    • Concentrating investments in a single strategy can be optimal to maximize return variance.

    Conclusions:

    • The optimal strategy for maximizing market share is contingent on specific game assumptions and contestant risk preferences.
    • Contestants must balance potential gains from specific strategies against the risks of unpredictable outcomes.
    • Understanding opponent behavior and return distributions is crucial for effective resource allocation in competitive scenarios.