Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Mental contrasting of a dieting wish improves self-reported health behaviour
K B Johannessen1, G Oettingen, D Mayer
1Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. kimbej@psy.au.dk
Abstract:
Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality standing in its way promotes commitment to feasible goals, whereas mentally indulging in a desired future does not. Dieting students (N = 134) reported their most important dieting wish that they deemed attainable within a 2-week period. Then, they were directed to mentally contrast or indulge in thoughts and images about the named dieting wish. A control condition was given no directions. Two weeks after the experiment, dieters retrospectively rated their behaviour change: in the mental contrasting condition they reported having eaten relatively fewer calories overall, fewer high-calorie food and more low-calorie food compared to those in the indulging and control conditions, and they also reported having been more physically active. This transfer effect from one health domain to another suggests a more generalised effect of mental contrasting versus indulging and control than previously assumed.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Schemas
Self-Regulation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Cognitive Dissonance
