Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is Spasticity a Syndrome? A Historical Perspective on Spasticity Definitions and Descriptions.

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Post-stroke flexed elbow deformity management: consensus opinion from an international Delphi expert panel.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence in Spasticity Assessment.

Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America·2026
Same author

High-fidelity but hypometric spatial localization of afterimages across saccades.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Feasibility and User Experience of Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke: Single-Arm Pretest-Posttest Pilot Study.

JMIR serious games·2026
Same author

The effectiveness of robotic therapy in reducing upper limb spasticity in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
08:07

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: February 1, 2018

The effect of using variable frequency trains during functional electrical stimulation cycling.

Simona Ferrante1, T Schauer, Giancarlo Ferrigno

  • 1Neuroengineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy; Technische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Regelungssysteme (Control Systems Group), Berlin, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Systems and Control Theory Group, Magdeburg, Germany; and Centro di Riabilitazione Villa Beretta, Ospedale Valduce, Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy.

Neuromodulation : Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
|December 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Catch-like-inducing trains (CITs) significantly enhance functional electrical stimulation cycling performance compared to constant-frequency trains (CFTs). This improved muscle activation and endurance may benefit stroke patients in rehabilitation.

More Related Videos

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:25

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 5, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
08:07

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: February 1, 2018

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:25

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 5, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Exercise Physiology

Background:

  • Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is used to induce muscle contractions for cycling.
  • Optimizing FES parameters is crucial for maximizing torque production and performance.
  • Variable frequency stimulation patterns are being explored to improve FES efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate variable frequency stimulation patterns for enhancing torque production in FES-induced cycling.
  • To compare the performance of catch-like-inducing trains (CITs) against constant-frequency trains (CFTs).

Main Methods:

  • Six able-bodied subjects underwent isokinetic cycling trials with quadriceps stimulation.
  • Constant-frequency trains (CFTs) and four types of catch-like-inducing trains (CITs) were applied.
  • Torque production, torque-time integral (TTI), and time to peak torque (T2P) were analyzed using ANOVA.

Main Results:

  • CITs significantly increased TTI and peak torque compared to CFTs across all conditions.
  • Post-fatigue, CITs with a mid-train doublet showed a 61% increase in TTI and 28% increase in peak torque versus CFTs.
  • CITs demonstrated reduced performance decline between pre-fatigue and post-fatigue states.

Conclusions:

  • Catch-like-inducing trains (CITs) offer superior performance in FES-induced cycling compared to constant-frequency trains (CFTs).
  • CITs may improve muscle strength and endurance, potentially aiding gait training in stroke survivors.
  • This stimulation approach could be clinically valuable for stroke patients by maximizing performance without excessive intensity increase.