Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
[The relevance of head-to-head trials to patient-centred clinical research]
Walter Lehmacher1, Stephanie Wolff
1Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universität zu Köln. walterlehmacher@uni-koeln.de
Abstract:
Head-to-head trials can contribute considerably to improving patient-centred care. To ensure that patients are optimally supplied with drugs and medical devices following market release, it is necessary to choose the best therapy from several options. The gold standard of efficacy comparisons is randomised head-to-head studies comparing alternative methods. These trials establish the evidence base for choosing and excluding a treatment, which in turn improves the quality of health care services, even from an economic point of view. These trials are performed under high international quality standards of planning, conducting and reporting. Since comparative effectiveness research (CER) largely includes science-initiated investigations, all stakeholders should participate in the funding of these studies.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

