Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
[Goal-directed renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery]
Jia-rui Xu1, Jie Teng, Jian-zhou Zou
1Department of Nephrology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Insights
Goal-directed renal replacement therapy (GDRRT) and daily high volume hemofiltration (dHVHF) show similar survival and safety for post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury (AKI). GDRRT offers superior renal recovery and cost savings.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following cardiac surgery.
- Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is crucial for managing AKI.
- Comparing different RRT modalities is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of goal-directed renal replacement therapy (GDRRT) versus daily high volume hemofiltration (dHVHF) in patients with AKI post-cardiac surgery.
- To evaluate outcomes including mortality, renal function recovery, and adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 128 patients with AKI post-cardiac surgery.
- Patients received either GDRRT (n=64) or dHVHF (n=64).
- Key parameters analyzed: urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, hemodynamic stability, mortality rates, renal function recovery, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Hospital mortality was similar (43.75%) in both groups.
- GDRRT showed a significantly higher complete renal function recovery rate (39.1% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.01).
- dHVHF patients had longer ICU stays and mechanical ventilation durations, higher incidences of tachycardia and blood coagulation, and increased hospitalization costs.
Conclusions:
- GDRRT and dHVHF demonstrate comparable short-term survival and safety profiles for post-cardiac surgery AKI.
- GDRRT is a more effective and cost-efficient strategy for improving renal function recovery.
- GDRRT may be preferred for its benefits in renal recovery and economic advantages.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy and safety of goal-directed renal replacement therapy(GDRRT) and daily high volume hemofiltration (dHVHF) in the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery.
Methods:
Clinical data from 128 patients received either GDRRT (n = 64) or dHVHF (n = 64) for AKI after cardiac surgery were analyzed retrospectively. parameters examined included: urea nitrogen, serum creatinine (SCr, before and after treatment), heart rate, mean artery pressure (MAp, recorded within 72 hours after the initiation of renal replacement therapy). The hospital mortality, day-28 mortality, renal function recovery rate, and the incidence of adverse events in the two groups were also compared.
Results:
The hospital mortality was 43.75% for both GDRRT and dHVHF treated patients (group). The day-28 mortality in GDRRT group were slightly lower, but the difference was not significant (43.75% vs. 57.81%, P = 0.055). Also no significant difference was found between the two groups in hospital stay. The patients received dHVHF had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (hours) and duration of mechanical ventilation (days) as compared to the patients received GDRRT [356.5 (176.3, 554.6) vs. 238.3 (119.6, 440.9), P = 0.023; 8.0 (5.0, 16.0) vs. 6.0 (3.0, 13.5), P = 0.042]. The logistic regression analyses showed that complete renal function recovery rate in GDRRT group was significantly higher (39.1% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.01). The partial renal function recovery rate in GDRRT group was slightly lower but not statistically different from dHVHF group (3.1% vs. 9.4%, P > 0.05). In dHVHF group, the maximum SCr during the treatment, and the SCr before discharge were both significantly higher than GDRRT group (μmol/L: SCr maximum 559.0 ± 236.0 vs. 440.4 ± 192.0, SCr before discharge 381.4 ± 267.0 vs. 271.2 ± 164.4, both P < 0.01). No significant difference was found between the two groups in incidence of hypotension (35.9% vs. 37.5%) and MAP (mm Hg, 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa, 82 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 15) 72 hours into the therapy (both P > 0.05). The incidence of tachycardia, and incidence of blood coagulation were both higher in dHVHF group (78.1% vs. 59.4%, 35.9% vs. 20.3%, both P < 0.05). However, the hospitalization expense (thousand yuan) was significantly higher for dHVHF group (15.00 ± 2.80 vs. 9.85 ± 3.00, P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
For patients with post-cardiac surgery AKI, GDRRT and dHVHF are very similar in terms of short-term survival rate and safety. But GDRRT is superior for renal function recovery and cost saving.
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
