Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

Study Design in Statistics

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports

Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Applying a mixed-methods approach to evaluate and tailor electronic cigarette pictorial health warning labels for young adults in the United States.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Psychosocial correlates of condom use among Black adolescents in the United States: A meta-analysis.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026

Same author

Characterizing the Objective Features of Vaping Prevention Video Ads: A Content Analysis.

American journal of preventive medicine·2025

Same author

Patterns of Felt Stigma Among Rural-Dwelling People Who Use Drugs: A Latent Class Analysis.

Substance use & misuse·2025

Same author

Perceived risks, reasons for use, and barriers to cessation among youth who use multiple tobacco products.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Perceptions of Prevention and Cessation Ads among US Youth Who Use Multiple Tobacco Products: A Qualitative Study.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions.

Nancy Grant Harrington¹, Seth M Noar

¹Department of Communication, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0042, USA. nancy.harrington@uky.edu

Health Education Research

|December 14, 2011

Summary

Message tailoring research needs consistent reporting standards. This study provides seven recommendations to improve the conduct and reporting of tailored intervention studies for better scientific advancement.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

Health Communication
Behavioral Science
Intervention Research

Background:

Message tailoring, adapting communication to individual characteristics, is a key persuasive strategy.
Existing research on tailored interventions lacks consistent reporting of development, implementation, and evaluation.
This inconsistency hinders the cumulative growth of tailoring science.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose standardized recommendations for reporting studies on tailored interventions.
To address the identified inconsistencies in the tailored intervention literature.
To facilitate theory development and research translation in message tailoring.

Main Methods:

Review of the tailoring literature to identify reporting inconsistencies.
Comparison of identified inconsistencies with existing reporting standards.
Development of specific recommendations with feedback from an advisory board of tailoring researchers.

Main Results:

Seven distinct recommendations for reporting tailored intervention studies have been developed.
These recommendations aim to standardize the reporting of intervention development, implementation, and evaluation.
The recommendations are designed to enhance the cumulative nature of tailoring science.

Conclusions:

Establishing clear reporting standards is crucial for advancing the science of message tailoring.
Adoption of these recommendations will improve the rigor and reproducibility of tailored intervention research.
Standardized reporting will support both theoretical advancements and practical application of tailoring strategies.