Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

07:34
A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
Published on: March 25, 2014
Relationships between spike-free local field potentials and spike timing in human temporal cortex
Stavros Zanos1, Theodoros P Zanos, Vasilis Z Marmarelis
1Washington National Primate Research Center, 1705 NE Pacific, I-421, Box 357330, Seattle, WA 98195-7330, USA. stavroszanos@yahoo.com
Journal of Neurophysiology
|December 14, 2011
Summary
Local field potentials (LFPs) predict action potential (AP) timing in human temporal cortex. Analyzing spike-free LFPs revealed distinct neuronal groups, with timing predictable by LFP phase or power.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Intracortical recordings capture fast action potentials (APs) and slower local field potentials (LFPs).
- LFPs are thought to reflect synaptic activity, but their precise relationship with AP occurrence, especially concerning LFP frequency components, remains unclear.
- AP waveforms can contaminate LFP signals, complicating analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between specific LFP signal components and the timing of individual APs.
- To determine which LFP features causally relate to synaptic potentials and AP occurrence.
- To model the prediction of AP timing from LFPs, considering the impact of AP contributions.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative, nonlinear, causal dynamic models were developed to predict AP timing from LFPs in human temporal cortex recordings.
- Models were evaluated both with and without the removal of AP contributions from the LFP signal.
- Analysis focused on millisecond-resolution data to discern fine-grained temporal relationships.
Main Results:
- Significant numbers of single AP timings were predictable from spike-free LFPs across various frequencies.
- Model performance was better when AP contributions were not removed from LFPs.
- Two distinct groups of cells emerged: one associated with low LFP frequencies and phase locking, the other with high LFP frequencies and power.
- Spike timing prediction differed between groups, relying on preceding LFP sign/level or LFP power, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Specific LFP components, even after spike removal, contain predictive information about neuronal firing timing.
- The relationship between LFPs and APs is complex and can be categorized into distinct neuronal response patterns.
- Dynamic modeling of LFPs offers insights into synaptic mechanisms underlying action potential generation.

