Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.

G Measso1, E Zaidel

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.

Neuropsychologia
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of neurofeedback on hemispheric word recognition.

Brain and cognition·2005
Same author

Parasagittal asymmetries of the corpus callosum.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2005
Same author

The alien hand syndrome: classification of forms reported and discussion of a new condition.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2003
Same author

Effects of right and left hemisphere damage on performance of the "Right Hemisphere Communication Battery".

Brain and language·2002
Same author

Error monitoring in the hemispheres: the effect of lateralized feedback on lexical decision.

Cognition·2001
Same author

Hemispheric contributions to pragmatics.

Brain and cognition·2000
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

This study found a right visual field advantage for word recognition, indicating independent lexical processing in each brain hemisphere. Response programming did not influence these hemispheric differences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Investigating hemispheric asymmetries in language processing is crucial for understanding brain function.
  • Lexical decision tasks are standard tools for probing word recognition mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine hemispheric differences in lexical decision tasks using different response conditions.
  • To determine if response programming affects visual field advantages in word recognition.
  • To evaluate existing psycholinguistic models of lexical access.

Main Methods:

  • Administered a lateralized tachistoscopic lexical decision task to normal subjects.
  • Utilized concrete nouns and regular nonwords across Yes-No and Go-NoGo response conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured accuracy, sensitivity, and latency for stimuli presented in the left and right visual fields.
  • Main Results:

    • Observed an overall right visual field advantage in accuracy and sensitivity.
    • Found an interaction between visual hemifield and wordness in response latency.
    • Confirmed that experimental conditions did not interact with visual field effects, suggesting response programming is independent of hemispheric asymmetries.

    Conclusions:

    • Lexical access appears to be independent and similarly processed in both hemispheres.
    • Response programming is also similar across hemispheres and does not influence observed asymmetries.
    • The findings support a psycholinguistic model proposing separate, parallel computations for word and nonword decisions within each hemisphere.