Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Does aggressive glycemic control benefit macrovascular and microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes? Insights from
Toni Terry1, Kalyani Raravikar, Nalurporn Chokrungvaranon
1Division of Endocrinology, Phoenix VA Health Care System, 650 East Indian School Road, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA. toni.terry@va.gov
Abstract:
Diabetes is increasing rapidly worldwide and frequently results in severe vascular complications. A target glycated hemoglobin of less than 7% has commonly been recommended in hopes of preventing both macrovascular and microvascular complications. Although results from trials of intensive glycemic control have generally supported the notion that lower glycated hemoglobin values reduce microvascular disease, the evidence for similar benefits for macrovascular disease has been less clear. As macrovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes, this remains one of the more important unresolved clinical questions. Recent results from the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT studies have challenged the conventional believe that lower glycated hemoglobin values should be pursued in all diabetic patients. Factors that may influence whether intensive glucose management is advisable include duration of diabetes, pre-existing macrovascular disease, hypoglycemic unawareness, and significant comorbidities. Glycated hemoglobin goals should account for these factors and be individualized for each patient.
Insights
Intensive glucose control in diabetes may not benefit everyone. Individualized glycated hemoglobin goals are essential, considering factors like diabetes duration and existing vascular disease.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Metabolic Diseases
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus is a global health crisis, often leading to serious vascular complications.
- A glycated hemoglobin target below 7% is widely recommended to prevent microvascular and macrovascular issues.
- Evidence supporting intensive glycemic control for macrovascular disease prevention in type 2 diabetes is inconsistent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of intensive glycemic control in preventing vascular complications in type 2 diabetes.
- To analyze recent trial data (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT) challenging traditional glycated hemoglobin targets.
- To determine factors influencing the advisability of intensive glucose management.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trial data on intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
- Analysis of factors such as diabetes duration, pre-existing macrovascular disease, and comorbidities.
- Assessment of the impact of intensive glucose management on microvascular and macrovascular outcomes.
Main Results:
- Intensive glycemic control trials show benefits for microvascular disease but less clarity for macrovascular disease.
- Recent studies (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT) question universal application of lower glycated hemoglobin targets.
- Factors like diabetes duration, existing macrovascular disease, and comorbidities influence treatment outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Lowering glycated hemoglobin to below 7% may not be universally beneficial for all type 2 diabetes patients.
- Individualized glycated hemoglobin goals are crucial, considering patient-specific factors.
- Personalized treatment strategies are necessary to optimize outcomes and minimize risks associated with intensive glucose management.
Related Concept Videos
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
