Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

C B Warner1, J F Juola, H Koshino

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045.

Perception & Psychophysics
|September 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased metabolite production by deletion of an HDA1-type histone deacetylase in the phytopathogenic fungi, Magnaporthe oryzae (Pyricularia oryzae) and Fusarium asiaticum.

Letters in applied microbiology·2017
Same author

Simplicissin, a New Pollen Growth Inhibitor Produced by the Fungus, Penicillium cf. simplidssimum (Oudemans) Thorn No. 410.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016
Same author

Easy Preparation of Methyl 7-epi-Jasmonate and Four Stereoisomers of Methyl Cucurbate, and Assessment of the Stereogenic Effect of Jasmonate on Phytohormonal Activities.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016
Same author

Isolation of Some Glucosides as Aroma Precursors from Ginger.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016
Same author

Pesthetoxin, a New Phytotoxin Produced by the Gray Blight Fungus, Pestalotiopsis theae.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016
Same author

Gamahonolides A, B, and Gamahorin, Novel Antifungal Compounds from Stromata of Epichloe typhina on Phleum pratense.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016

Peripheral cues do not automatically capture attention more effectively than central cues. With practice, individuals can volitionally control attention, suggesting attentional capture is not strongly automatic.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Attention Research

Background:

  • Investigating the mechanisms of attention is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.
  • Distinguishing between volitional (top-down) and automatic (bottom-up) attention is a key area of research.
  • The role of cue type (central vs. peripheral) in directing attention requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if abrupt-onset peripheral cues differ in eliciting attention compared to instructional central cues.
  • To test for separable attentional systems responsive to different cue types.
  • To examine the automaticity of attentional capture by peripheral stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Compared attention orienting using peripheral cues versus central instructional cues.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Assessed participants' ability to override automatic capture by peripheral cues after practice.
  • Utilized behavioral measures to quantify attentional engagement and disengagement.

    • Main Results:

    • Peripheral cues were not more effective in orienting attention than central cues.
    • Evidence did not support distinct volitional and automatic attentional systems for central and peripheral cues, respectively.
    • Peripheral cues demonstrated an automatic component, hindering attentional disengagement initially.
    • Participants learned to volitionally redirect attention, overcoming automatic capture by peripheral cues with practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Attentional orienting may involve a shared attentional process activated by both central and peripheral cues.
    • Attentional capture by abrupt-onset peripheral stimuli is not rigidly automatic and can be modulated by learning and volitional control.