Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
Published on: March 15, 2024
Prolonged cold ischemic times and less donor-recipient histocompatibility accelerate graft vascular disease
L S C Czer1, A V Wong, H Soukiasian
1Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. Lawrence.czer@cshs.org
Insights
Longer cold storage and reduced donor-recipient compatibility worsen graft vascular disease (GVD) after heart transplants. Greater histocompatibility can lessen the negative impact of extended cold ischemic preservation time (CIPT) on GVD.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Vascular biology
- Organ preservation
Background:
- Graft atherosclerosis, or graft vascular disease (GVD), limits long-term cardiac transplant success and is the primary cause of late allograft failure.
- Understanding factors influencing GVD is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of cold ischemic preservation time (CIPT) and donor-recipient histocompatibility on GVD development.
- To utilize a rat heterotopic cardiac transplantation model to assess these factors.
Main Methods:
- Three rat donor-recipient strain combinations with varying degrees of histocompatibility (ACI-Lewis, Lewis-F344, Lewis-Lewis) were used.
- Grafts underwent varying CIPT durations (0, 4, and 24 hours).
- Graft atherosclerosis was quantified by intimal area ratio (IAR), intimal thickness score (ITS), and rejection score (RS) at 90 days.
Main Results:
- Longer CIPT (24 vs 0 hours) significantly increased rejection scores in Lewis-Lewis and Lewis-F344 groups.
- The Lewis-F344 group showed significantly higher IAR, ITS, and RS with longer CIPT.
- ACI-Lewis allografts exhibited high GVD across all CIPT durations, with significantly higher IAR, ITS, and RS compared to Lewis-Lewis and Lewis-F344 groups at 0 hours CIPT.
Conclusions:
- Both prolonged CIPT and reduced donor-recipient histocompatibility are associated with increased GVD.
- Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) mismatches, as seen in ACI-Lewis grafts, exacerbated GVD.
- Non-MHC antigen differences also contributed to GVD, though greater histocompatibility in Lewis-Lewis isografts mitigated the effects of longer ischemic times.
Introduction:
The long-term success of cardiac transplantation is limited by graft atherosclerosis, also known as graft vascular disease (GVD). GVD is currently the leading cause of late allograft failure in cardiac transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of cold ischemic preservation time (CIPT) and degree of donor-recipient histocompatibility on GVD using a rat heterotopic cardiac transplantation model.
Methods:
ACI-Lewis (n=9), Lewis-F344 (n=9), and Lewis-Lewis (n=9) donor-recipient rat strain combinations were subjected to variable durations of CIPT (0, 4, and 24 hours in University of Wisconsin solution at 4°C) prior to transplantation (n=81 total). The ACI-Lewis allografts differed in both major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II antigens, the Lewis-F344 allograft combination differed in multiple non-MHC antigens, and the Lewis-Lewis isograft combination was syngeneic. Grafts were harvested at 90 days. Intimal area ratio (IAR), intimal thickness score (ITS), and rejection score (RS) were determined for each specimen.
Results:
The Lewis-Lewis transplant group had a significantly higher mean RS (P=.036) with 24 hours than with 0 hours of CIPT in this rat heterotopic transplantation model at 90 days. The Lewis-F344 group had a significantly higher IAR (P=.035), ITS (P=.030), and RS (P=.017) with 24 hours than with 0 hours of CIPT. The ACI-Lewis group had high levels of GVD with all durations of CIPT (0, 4, and 24 hours); as a consequence, there were no significant differences in the ITS, IAR, or RS. With 0 hours of CIPT, the ACI-Lewis transplantation group yielded a significantly higher mean IAR (P=.029), ITS (P=.003), and RS (P=5.02×10(-5)) than the Lewis-Lewis group. The Lewis-F344 group had a significantly higher mean RS (P=.003) than the Lewis-Lewis (syngeneic) group. The ACI-Lewis transplantation group had a significantly higher mean IAR (P=.035), and trended toward a higher ITS (P=.058) than the Lewis-F344 group.
Conclusion:
Longer cold ischemic preservation time and less donor-recipient histocompatibility were associated with more advanced GVD in a rat heterotopic transplantation model, especially when there were multiple MHC mismatches as in ACI-Lewis allografts, but also occurred when there were differences in multiple non-MHC antigens as in the Lewis-F344 allografts. There was a lesser effect of longer cold ischemic time on GVD in the Lewis-Lewis syngeneic (isograft) group, suggesting that greater histocompatibility can mitigate the adverse effects of longer ischemic times.
Related Concept Videos
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
