Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining of Four Endometrial Immune Cell Types in Recurrent Miscarriage
Published on: August 4, 2021
Endometrial cell counts in recurrent miscarriage: a comparison of counting methods
Josephine A Drury1, Helena Nik, Robbert H F van Oppenraaij
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. jadrury@liv.ac.uk
Computer-aided image analysis using ImageJ provides more reproducible results for counting uterine natural killer (uNK) cells in endometrial tissue compared to manual methods. This improves the reliability of uNK cell density assessments in research.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive immunology
- Cell biology
- Medical imaging analysis
Background:
- Accurate quantification of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells is crucial for understanding endometrial function and reproductive health.
- Manual cell counting methods for uNK cells can be subjective and lack reproducibility.
- Diverse endometrial tissue presents challenges for consistent cell density measurements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reproducibility of manual cell counting with two computer-aided methods using ImageJ software.
- To evaluate the reliability of ImageJ's 'point picker' and 'particle analysis' tools for quantifying uNK cells.
- To determine the optimal method for assessing uNK cell density in endometrial immunohistochemistry.
Main Methods:
- Immunohistochemistry for CD56(+) uNK cells on human endometrium.
- Manual counting using a tally counter and graticule.
- Computer-aided counting using ImageJ 'point picker' and 'particle analysis' tools.
- Statistical analysis including coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman plots for interobserver variability.
Main Results:
- Computer-aided methods (ImageJ point picker and particle analysis) showed significantly lower interobserver CVs than manual counting.
- Interobserver CVs for manual counting were 8.2% (6.5%), while ImageJ methods yielded 6.1% (3.3%) and 4.7% (3.9%).
- Mean inter- and intra-observer CVs for %uNK were improved with ImageJ analysis, ranging from 6.8% (4.3%) to 10.3% (6.6%).
- Bland-Altman analysis confirmed no systematic differences in cell counts across methods relative to cell numbers.
Conclusions:
- Computer-aided image analysis with ImageJ offers superior reproducibility for assessing uNK cell density compared to manual counting.
- ImageJ tools provide a more reliable and objective method for quantifying uNK cells in immunohistochemistry.
- This improved methodology enhances the accuracy of research involving uNK cell density in diverse endometrial tissues.
More Related Videos
07:46Platform for Quantitative Detection of Endometrial Immune Cells Based on Immunohistochemistry and Digital Image Analysis
Published on: October 13, 2023
08:29Measurement of Four Uterine NK Cell Subtypes Using Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure
Published on: October 25, 2024