Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

09:36
Modified Heterotopic Hindlimb Osteomyocutaneous Flap Model in the Rat for Translational Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Research
Published on: April 26, 2019
[The osteomyoplastic flap, a contribution to neurosurgery]
Francisco Manuel Grajeda-García1, Fanny Mercado-Caloca
1Departamento de Neurocirugía, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. francisco_graj@yahoo.com.mx
Revista Medica Del Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social
|December 20, 2011
Summary
The osteomyoplastic flap reduces cosmetic deformities after pterional craniotomy, though it takes longer. Both surgical approaches had similar complication rates for brain tumors and vascular conditions.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Plastic Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
Background:
- Pterional craniotomy can lead to cosmetic deformities, including temporal muscle atrophy and facial nerve damage.
- These deformities result from the surgical technique and post-operative muscle changes.
- Evaluating aesthetic and functional outcomes is crucial for patient satisfaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare functional and aesthetic complications between classic pterional approach and osteomyoplastic flap.
- To assess patient-perceived outcomes in supratentorial surgical pathology.
- To identify the optimal surgical technique for minimizing post-craniotomy deformities.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational comparative study.
- Inclusion of patients undergoing pterional approach for supratentorial pathology (vascular or tumoral).
- Comparison between classic pterional approach and osteomyoplastic pterional flap.
Main Results:
- Osteomyoplastic flap resulted in significantly less perceived hollowing (p = 0.013).
- Classic pterional approach had significantly shorter surgical time (p < 0.001).
- No significant difference in the overall frequency of complications was observed.
Conclusions:
- The osteomyoplastic flap offers superior aesthetic results by reducing temporal hollowing.
- The classic pterional approach is associated with reduced operative time.
- Both techniques demonstrate comparable complication rates, making the choice dependent on prioritizing aesthetic outcomes versus surgical efficiency.