Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

Quality Control

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the method...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Education as a Tool to Navigate Changing Technology in Radiation Oncology.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same author

ARTIA-Cervix: a prospective trial of adaptive radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2025

Same author

Dosimetric Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Versus Reduced Margin Computed Tomography Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025

Same author

A Retrospective Analysis of the First Clinical 5DCT Workflow.

Cancers·2025

Same author

Introducing a novel sub-millimeter lung CT image registration error quantitation tool.

Medical physics·2024

Same author

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Guidance for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from the MIRAGE Randomized Clinical Trial.

European urology·2024

Same journal

Integrative Medicine for Breast Cancer Survivors.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same journal

Integrative Oncology Approaches for Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Risk Reduction in Patients With Digestive Tract Cancers.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same journal

Integrative Oncology and Radiation Therapy: An Essential Evolution.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same journal

Clinical Trials of Integrative Oncology Interventions for Radiation Therapy: Emerging Evidence and Opportunities.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same journal

Nonpharmacologic Approaches for Pain Management in Patients With Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

Same journal

Integrative Therapies for Radiation-Related Toxicities in Hematological Malignancies.

Seminars in radiation oncology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality.

Kevin L Moore¹, R Scott Brame, Daniel A Low

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. kmoore@radonc.wustl.edu

Seminars in Radiation Oncology

|December 20, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying radiotherapy treatment plan quality remains challenging due to subjective evaluations. New quantitative metrics and automation offer a path toward more objective and consistent treatment planning, improving patient care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology
Clinical Informatics

Background:

Radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation is largely subjective, leading to variability among practitioners.
Quantifying plan quality is complex due to uncertainties in dose response and technological advancements.
The human element in treatment planning adds to the subjectivity of quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To review strategies for implementing quantitative metrics in radiotherapy treatment planning.
To explore the potential of clinical informatics and automation in improving plan quality assessment.
To present a case study on using quantitative techniques in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on quantitative metrics in radiotherapy planning.
Discussion of general strategies for metric implementation.
Case study analysis of IMRT plan optimization using quantitative control.

Main Results:

Quantitative metrics and automation are becoming more accessible for treatment planning.
Implementing quantitative strategies can help establish control over variable systems.
The case study demonstrates the application of these techniques in IMRT.

Conclusions:

Quantitative metrics are crucial for reducing subjectivity and variability in radiotherapy plan evaluation.
Advancements in clinical informatics and automation are key enablers for objective treatment planning.
The presented strategies and case study offer a framework for improving radiotherapy quality assurance.