Validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish Lyme meningitis from aseptic meningitis

Keri A Cohn1, Amy D Thompson, Samir S Shah

  • 1Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Pediatrics
|December 21, 2011
PubMed

Insights

The Rule of 7's accurately identifies children at low risk for Lyme meningitis, with only 2% of low-risk patients without a rash developing the condition. This suggests low-risk children can be managed as outpatients pending test results.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Prediction Rules

Background:

  • Lyme meningitis is a significant concern in children residing in endemic areas.
  • Accurate clinical prediction rules are crucial for timely diagnosis and management.
  • The Rule of 7's is a proposed clinical prediction rule for identifying low-risk children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the Rule of 7's in a multicenter cohort of pediatric patients.
  • To assess the rule's accuracy in classifying children with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis.
  • To determine the utility of the Rule of 7's in guiding outpatient management.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study involving children from three emergency departments in Lyme disease-endemic regions.
  • Inclusion criteria: CSF pleocytosis and available Lyme serology.
  • Lyme meningitis definition: Positive Lyme serology or erythema migrans (EM) rash.

Main Results:

  • Out of 423 children, 117 (28%) had Lyme meningitis.
  • The Rule of 7's identified 130 low-risk children; 5 (4%) had Lyme meningitis (sensitivity 96%, specificity 41%).
  • In children without EM, only 3 of 127 low-risk patients (2%) had Lyme meningitis.

Conclusions:

  • The Rule of 7's demonstrates high sensitivity for identifying children with Lyme meningitis.
  • Children classified as low-risk by the Rule of 7's have a low probability of having Lyme meningitis.
  • The Rule of 7's supports outpatient management for low-risk children while awaiting Lyme serology results.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction01:22

Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction

Bacterial meningitis is a severe, life-threatening inflammation of the meninges, particularly the pia mater and arachnoid mater, affecting the subarachnoid space, ventricles, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). If untreated, it can lead to significant neurological complications or death.Causative AgentsCommon pathogens vary with age and immune status. In adults, major organisms include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae. Streptococcus agalactiae (group B...
Viral Meningitis01:18

Viral Meningitis

Viral meningitis is the most common form of meningitis and is often referred to as aseptic meningitis to indicate the absence of bacterial involvement. It is generally milder than bacterial meningitis, with symptoms including fever, headache, stiff neck, drowsiness, nausea, photophobia, and vomiting. Rarely, more severe manifestations or death may occur. Common causative agents include enteroviruses, particularly coxsackie A and B viruses and echoviruses, all members of the Enterovirus genus...
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology01:26

Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology

Bacterial meningitis typically begins when pathogens such as Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae colonize the nasopharynx and invade the bloodstream. This process is facilitated by bacterial virulence factors, such as polysaccharide capsules, which resist phagocytosis and complement-mediated killing. Less commonly, bacteria reach the central nervous system via contiguous spread from infections like otitis media or sinusitis, through congenital or acquired dural defects, or...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...