Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation01:25

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation

Several factors are considered while creating a patient's care plan. Motivation is a factor in improving communication, and patients often require encouragement to try different approaches involving significant change. It is essential to involve the patient and family in decisions about the plan of care to determine whether the suggested methods are acceptable. Consider meeting critical comfort and safety needs before introducing new communication methods and techniques. Allow adequate time for...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Nursing Implementation01:15

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of general practitioners' needs and barriers in primary health care delivery in Asia Pacific region.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2019
Same author

ER/LA opioid REMS and accredited education: Survey results provide insight into clinical roles, educational needs, and learner preferences.

Substance abuse·2017
Same author

Typical Time to Treatment of Patients With Lung Cancer in a Multisite, US-Based Study.

Journal of oncology practice·2016
Same author

Smoking cessation: a community-based approach to continuing medical education.

Translational behavioral medicine·2015
Same author

Developing clinical competencies to assess learning needs and outcomes: the experience of the CS2day initiative.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2011
Same author

Sharing collaborative designs of tobacco cessation performance improvement CME projects.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Evaluation of a collaborative program on smoking cessation: translating outcomes framework into practice.

Marianna B Shershneva1, Christopher Larrison, Sheila Robertson

  • 1Office of Continuing Professional Development in Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA. mbshershneva@ocpd.wisc.edu

The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
|December 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated a collaborative smoking cessation program for clinicians, finding it positively impacted clinician practices and patient outcomes. The program achieved a 46.8% smoking quit rate, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving public health.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Public Health
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Evaluating continuing education programs, especially complex, multicomponent ones, is challenging but crucial.
  • This study addresses the need for routine, multi-level outcome evaluation in collaborative healthcare education.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report on strategies and results from evaluating a US-based, collaborative, multicomponent smoking cessation educational program for clinicians.
  • To assess the program's impact across multiple outcome levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 6-level outcomes-based evaluation model.
  • Employed diverse data collection methods including registration data, satisfaction surveys, knowledge/competence assessments (vs. comparison group), commitment to change, patient chart reviews for performance measures, and patient cessation rates.
  • Included a success case method study and partner collaboration assessment.

Main Results:

  • The program engaged over 43,000 clinicians, with high satisfaction and improved competency scores compared to a control group.
  • Most participants reported intended and implemented practice changes.
  • Performance improvement activities showed varied results, with one activity demonstrating significant improvement (9.0%-36.2% across 8 measures) and others achieving a 46.8% smoking quit rate.

Conclusions:

  • The smoking cessation program demonstrated an overall positive impact on clinicians and patients.
  • A unified outcomes assessment framework, common measures, and shared data repositories were key to successful evaluation of this collaborative initiative.
  • The findings and evaluation approach are recommended for future collaborative program evaluations.