Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Color Vision

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Environmental psychology as the science of context: grand challenges for the next decade.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Quantification of Longitudinal HRCT Changes During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

A digital index for veneer positioning during adhesive cementation: A dental technique.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026

Same author

Combining custom retraction, fiducial markers, and splinted implant scan bodies for mandibular complete arch implant scanning: A dental technique.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026

Same author

Accuracy is a behavior, not a number: a metrological reporting framework for complete-arch implant scanning.

Journal of dentistry·2026

Same author

How semantic context and temporal dynamics affect egocentric and allocentric spatial representations.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Sequential vs simultaneous encoding of spatial information: a comparison between the blind and the sighted.

Francesco Ruotolo¹, Gennaro Ruggiero, Michela Vinciguerra

¹Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Italy.

Acta Psychologica

|December 24, 2011

Summary

Processing styles, not visual impairment, shape spatial mental images in blind individuals. This study found that how spatial information is processed impacts mental imagery more than blindness itself.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Spatial Cognition

Background:

Understanding spatial mental imagery in blind individuals is crucial for developing effective navigation and learning strategies.
Previous research has debated whether visual impairment or sensory processing differences influence spatial cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether visual impairment or processing style (simultaneous vs. sequential) is the primary determinant of spatial mental image characteristics in blind individuals.
To compare spatial information processing between congenitally blind, adventitiously blind, and sighted individuals with manipulated visual input.

Main Methods:

Participants learned spatial layouts through movement alone or vision plus movement.
A sequential sighted group experienced visual obstacles to simulate non-simultaneous processing.
Mental scanning times and distance relationships were analyzed across groups.

Main Results:

A linear relationship between time and distance was observed in all groups, but was less pronounced in sequential sighted and blind participants.
Congenitally blind and sequential sighted groups exhibited nearly identical performance.
Group differences emerged at distances greater than 5 meters, suggesting processing limitations in integrating spatial information.

Conclusions:

The findings suggest that the processing style, particularly the sequential integration of spatial information, significantly influences spatial mental imagery.
The results indicate that the characteristics of sensory processing, rather than visual impairment per se, are key factors in shaping spatial mental images for blind individuals.