Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview01:28

Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

Cardiac catheterization is an invasive diagnostic technique used to identify and evaluate structural and functional diseases of the heart and major blood vessels. This technique diagnoses congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, and coronary spasms and assesses ventricular function. It helps guide treatment decisions, including the need for revascularization procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic performance of multiple artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for diabetic retinopathy screening in primary care: Evidence from real-world settings in India.

Indian journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Community Optometrist-Led Monitoring of Quiescent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The FENETRE Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Intermediate Risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Treatment: A Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials.

European urology oncology·2026
Same author

Seizure prophylaxis in glioma surgery (SPRING): A multi-center, unblinded, randomized trial.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

PARTIAL: study protocol for a clinical and cost-effectiveness of complex PARTIAL vs radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma randomised trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

Evaluation of non-ophthalmologist-led and offline AI-assisted models for diabetic retinopathy screening in India: a pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study.

BMJ open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
10:28

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

Published on: March 15, 2022

A framework for the evaluation of new interventional procedures.

Tania Lourenco1, Adrian M Grant, Jennifer M Burr

  • 1Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK. taniapclourenco@gmail.com

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|December 24, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This paper proposes a novel framework for evaluating new interventional procedures, addressing a gap in current regulatory oversight. The framework guides evidence generation from development through implementation for improved patient safety and procedure effectiveness.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
12:00

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model

Published on: November 24, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
10:28

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function

Published on: March 15, 2022

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
12:00

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model

Published on: November 24, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Medical Technology Assessment
  • Health Services Research
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Interventional procedures face less stringent regulation than pharmaceuticals.
  • Evaluation often relies on limited evidence from small observational studies.
  • Challenges include assessing skill, training, and defining novel procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a structured framework for evaluating new interventional procedures.
  • To provide guidance on evidence generation before clinical implementation.
  • To address the lack of a formal evaluation system for interventional procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a four-stage progressive evaluation framework.
  • Defining study types and data collection methods for each stage.
  • Framework stages: Development, Efficacy/Safety, Effectiveness/Cost-effectiveness, Implementation.

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive framework for interventional procedure evaluation is presented.
  • Guidance is provided on the types of evidence required at each stage.
  • The framework aims to standardize and improve the assessment process.

Conclusions:

  • This paper offers a foundational framework for evidence generation on new interventional procedures.
  • The challenges and limitations of applying this framework are discussed.
  • The proposed framework represents a crucial step towards more rigorous evaluation.