Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Introduction to Epidemiology

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Histotype-specific incidence and survival of urothelial carcinoma-an analysis of the German North Rhine-Westphalia Cancer Registry.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026

Same author

OPTILATER: optimal long-term survival after cancer - a cross-sectional study protocol for a quantitative survey on the care situation of long-term cancer survivors in Germany.

BMC cancer·2025

Same author

Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with UICC stage III colon carcinoma: A 20-year population-based German cohort study.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2025

Same author

Corrigendum to "Prognostic and predictive value of CA 19-9 inlocally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multiagent induction chemotherapy: results from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113)": [ESMO Open 7 (2024) 100552].

ESMO open·2024

Same author

Migraine or any headaches and white matter hyperintensities and their progression in women and men.

The journal of headache and pain·2024

Same author

Corrigendum to "Prognostic and predictive value of CA 19-9 in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multiagent induction chemotherapy: results from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113)": [ESMO Open 7 (2024) 100552].

ESMO open·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

[Causality and confounding in epidemiology].

¹Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale). andreas.stang@medizin.uni-halle.de

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband Der Arzte Des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))

|December 24, 2011

Summary

Understanding confounding in research is crucial. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) offer a superior method for identifying confounders and assessing bias in epidemiological studies compared to older definitions.

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Causal Inference
Biostatistics

Background:

Defining causality in empirical research presents challenges due to the impossibility of simultaneous exposure and non-exposure.
Counterfactual definitions of confounding rely on hypothetical substitute populations, which may not always be feasible.
Traditional definitions of confounding, like the collapsibility definition, have inherent limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate existing definitions of confounding in epidemiological research.
To introduce and advocate for the use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) as a more robust framework for causal inference.
To demonstrate the advantages of DAGs in identifying confounding and assessing covariate adjustment bias.

Main Methods:

Review of theoretical definitions of confounding, including counterfactual and collapsibility approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Introduction of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) as a graphical tool for representing causal relationships.

Comparison of DAGs with classical confounding theory, highlighting limitations of the latter.

Main Results:

The counterfactual definition of confounding is contingent on the feasibility of substitute populations.
The collapsibility definition of confounders exhibits significant limitations, rendering it less acceptable.
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) provide a more comprehensive approach, capable of identifying bias from covariate adjustment and utilizing information on confounder interrelationships.

Conclusions:

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) represent a significant advancement in understanding and addressing confounding in research.
DAGs offer a powerful method for visualizing and analyzing complex causal structures, improving the validity of epidemiological findings.
The application of DAGs enhances the ability to discern true causal effects from spurious associations.