Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Drug-eluting stent as an option for intractable in-stent coronary restenosis
Daisuke Hachinohe1, Myung Ho Jeong, Min Chol Kim
1The Heart Center of Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Insights
This case study highlights a patient with recurrent in-stent restenosis after bare-metal stent implantation. A final sirolimus-eluting stent successfully resolved the issue, preventing further restenosis and symptoms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) poses a significant challenge after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Bare-metal stents (BMS) have a higher risk of ISR compared to drug-eluting stents.
- Managing complex ISR cases requires tailored therapeutic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the management of a patient with multiple episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment modalities for recurrent ISR.
- To demonstrate the successful outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in a refractory ISR case.
Main Methods:
- A 51-year-old male patient with acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) underwent BMS implantation in the left anterior descending artery (LAD).
- The patient experienced five episodes of ISR, treated sequentially with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), brachytherapy, and additional BMS.
- The fifth ISR episode was treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES).
Main Results:
- The patient suffered five distinct episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after initial BMS implantation.
- Sequential treatments including POBA, brachytherapy, and additional BMS failed to provide long-term resolution.
- Implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) at the fifth ISR episode resulted in complete resolution of restenosis.
- The patient remained asymptomatic with no ISR on follow-up coronary angiography after SES implantation.
Conclusions:
- Sirolimus-eluting stents are highly effective in treating complex and recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) cases.
- Management of refractory ISR may require escalation of treatment strategies.
- Successful SES implantation can lead to long-term freedom from restenosis and symptoms.
Abstract:
A 51-year-old man was admitted due to an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. After thrombolytic therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, stent implantation was performed from the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) to the mid LAD using a bare-metal stent (BMS). Since then, the patient suffered five repeated episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR). At the first ISR, he was treated with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). At the second ISR, he was treated with brachytherapy, and at the third ISR, he was treated with POBA and one more BMS distal to the previously implanted stent. At the forth, only POBA was performed, and finally, at the fifth ISR, a sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted. Following that, the patient remained asymptomatic and follow-up coronary angiography showed no ISR.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
