Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026
05:53
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Testing gene-environment interaction in large-scale case-control association studies: possible choices and
Bhramar Mukherjee1, Jaeil Ahn, Stephen B Gruber
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
American Journal of Epidemiology
|December 27, 2011
Summary
New methods for screening gene-environment interactions offer improved power and control over false positives. Hybrid approaches show promise for genome-wide association studies, balancing power with accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Screening for gene-environment interactions is crucial for understanding complex diseases.
- Existing methods often rely on assumptions of gene-environment independence, which may not hold true.
- Data-adaptive methods have been developed to address these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively evaluate the power and type I error rates of different gene-environment interaction screening methods.
- To assess the performance of standard case-control, case-only, and various hybrid methods.
- To identify optimal strategies for future genome-wide scans.
Main Methods:
- A simulation study was conducted to compare three classes of procedures.
- Methods included standard 1-step case-control, case-only (assuming gene-environment independence), and hybrid approaches (empirical-Bayes, 2-step, model averaging).
- Performance was evaluated based on statistical power and type I error rates.
Main Results:
- The case-only method demonstrated high power but a substantial potential for false positives, especially in large studies.
- Hybrid methods effectively controlled false positives while maintaining significant power advantages over standard case-control tests.
- Gene-environment independence assumption can lead to inflated false positives when violated.
Conclusions:
- Alternatives to standard case-control analysis can yield major power gains in genome-wide scans for gene-environment interactions.
- Hybrid methods offer a robust balance between power and protection against false positives.
- The choice between case-only and hybrid methods depends on specific study characteristics and tolerance for errors.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Gene-Environment Interactions
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
02:27Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
01:23Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
01:11Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
01:09Epistasis Analysis
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...