Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From BioSkills to LifeSkills-a framework for developing life skills for non-science majors in introductory life science courses.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026

Same author

An evaluation of autonomic and gastrointestinal symptoms, and gastric emptying, in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Journal of scleroderma and related disorders·2024

Same author

Lamotrigine and exogenous estrogen among females with epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims data.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2023

Same author

Structured Engagement of Community Partners to Revise a Pregnancy Options Counseling Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2023

Same author

The need to accurately measure energy intake and expenditure in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Journal of scleroderma and related disorders·2022

Same author

Health Care and Adoption Service Experiences of People Who Placed Children for Adoption During Adolescence: A Qualitative Study.

Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Development and pilot testing of the faculty advisor evaluation questionnaire.

Elizabeth Harrison¹

¹School of Nursing, College of Health, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406, USA. e.harrison@usm.edu

The Journal of Nursing Education

|December 29, 2011

Summary

A new Faculty Advisor Evaluation Questionnaire (FAEQ) was developed and tested for nursing programs. This tool is designed to provide valid and reliable feedback on academic advising effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Nursing Education
Educational Psychology

Background:

Academic advising is crucial for nursing student success, satisfaction, and retention.
Accreditation standards highlight the importance of effective academic advising.
Valid and reliable evaluation tools are needed to assess advising quality.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and pilot test the Faculty Advisor Evaluation Questionnaire (FAEQ).
To assess the psychometric properties of the FAEQ for nursing academic advising.

Main Methods:

Instrument development based on qualitative nursing research.
Psychometric evaluation including face/content validity and reliability analysis.
Principle components factor analysis to determine questionnaire structure.

Main Results:

A 30-item FAEQ was developed with four factors explaining 81% of variability.
High internal consistency reliability was found (Cronbach's alpha 0.885–0.974).
The FAEQ demonstrated potential for valid and reliable results.

Conclusions:

The FAEQ is a promising instrument for evaluating nursing faculty advisors.
Further validation in diverse samples is recommended to confirm findings.
Effective academic advising tools can enhance student outcomes in nursing programs.