Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Zebra II as A Novel System to Record Electrophysiological Signals in Zebrafish
Published on: August 16, 2024
The cost-effectiveness of drug regulation: the example of thorough QT/QTc studies
J C Bouvy1, M A Koopmanschap, R R Shah
1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Faculty of Health, Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. bouvy@bmg.eur.nl
Abstract:
We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guideline that requires a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study for all drugs under development. We compared two pharmacoeconomic scenarios: the health effects and costs resulting from implementing ICH E14 ("regulation" scenario) vs. not implementing ICH E14 ("no regulation" scenario). We used a dynamic population model to calculate the cost-effectiveness of ICH E14 for a prototype QT-prolonging antipsychotic drug entering the US and European markets. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of regulation vs. no regulation were ~€2.4 million per sudden cardiac death prevented and ~€187,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in users of antipsychotic drugs. The main driver of cost was the requirement for electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring of users of QTc-prolonging drugs. Even when several of the assumptions in the model were varied, there were no results in favor of regulation. Our study shows that cost-effectiveness analysis of drug regulatory measures is feasible and should be considered before developing such measures.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Clinical Trials: Overview

