Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: issues beyond stroke, myocardial infarction, and death
Kosmas I Paraskevas1, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Kyriakos Oikonomou
1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Nürnberg Süd, Germany. paraskevask@hotmail.com
Abstract:
Like the earlier multicenter General Anesthesia (GA) versus Local Anaesthesia (LA) for carotid surgery (GALA) trial, a recent independent study showed no difference in transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rates between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under LA compared with GA. Besides these outcomes, however, several additional issues may be of interest when comparing the 2 modalities. Examples include the occurrence of post-CEA patient delirium, cognitive dysfunction, and health-related quality of life, as well as the cost-effectiveness, length of hospitalization, and resource utilization. This commentary discusses and compares these outcomes of CEA performed under LA versus GA.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Stages of General Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
