Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

An Empirical Bayes approach for the study of phenotypic evolution from high-dimensional data.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Stochastic Phylogenetic Models of Shape.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Robustness of Process-Pattern Links Using Phylogenies-Insights from a Comparison of Eight Simulation Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Identifying parsimonious pathways of accumulation and convergent evolution from binary data.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomics reveals the intricate history of the most diverse group within Atyidae (Crustacea: Decapoda).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Diagnosing systematic errors and incomplete lineage sorting in the deep phylogeny of Collembola.

Systematic biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Simultaneously mapping and superimposing landmark configurations with parsimony as optimality criterion.

S A Catalano1, P A Goloboff

  • 1Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. sacatalano@gmail.com

Systematic Biology
|January 4, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel phylogenetic morphometrics method that integrates landmark alignment and ancestral state reconstruction. This approach improves shape change interpretation and tree scores by utilizing phylogenetic information during alignment.

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Comparative anatomy
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Current methods for mapping landmark data on phylogenetic trees often ignore phylogenetic information during alignment.
  • This can lead to misinterpretation of shape changes as evolutionary transformations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified method for mapping landmark configurations on phylogenetic trees that integrates alignment and ancestral assignment.
  • To ensure that inferred transformations accurately represent shape changes driven by common ancestry.

Main Methods:

  • A novel procedure merging the mapping and alignment steps into a single process.
  • Minimizes the sum of Euclidean distances between corresponding landmarks across tree nodes.
  • Extends previous parsimony-based methods for phylogenetic morphometrics.

Main Results:

  • The integrated method significantly improves tree scores compared to generalized and ordinary superimpositions (up to 5% and 11% respectively).
  • Demonstrates marked improvements in phylogenetic tree evaluation metrics.
  • Empirical results highlight the benefits of incorporating phylogenetic information directly into the alignment process.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating phylogenetic information into landmark alignment enhances the accuracy of shape change interpretation in evolutionary studies.
  • The proposed method offers a more robust framework for phylogenetic morphometrics.
  • This approach maximizes the extent to which landmark similarity is explained by evolutionary relationships.