The influence of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on hemorheological parameters

J Papp1, A Toth, B Sandor

  • 11st Department of Medicine, University of Pecs, School of Medicine, Pecs, Hungary.

Insights

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) causes fewer changes in blood flow properties and less red blood cell (RBC) damage compared to on-pump CABG. The off-pump technique is hemodynamically superior.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Hemodynamics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed using on-pump (extracorporeal perfusion) or off-pump (beating heart) techniques.
  • Off-pump CABG offers a more physiological surgical environment compared to on-pump procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the hemorheological effects of on-pump versus off-pump CABG.
  • To assess changes in blood viscosity, red blood cell aggregation and deformability, and platelet aggregation between the two surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Blood samples collected from patients undergoing on-pump (n=25) and off-pump (n=22) CABG at multiple time points.
  • Assessed hematocrit, plasma and whole blood viscosity, RBC aggregation and deformability, and platelet aggregation.
  • Utilized viscometry, aggregometry, filtrometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for analysis.

Main Results:

  • Hematocrit, viscosity, and RBC aggregation decreased during surgery and recovered postoperatively, with significantly lower values in the on-pump group.
  • SEM revealed more damaged red blood cells in the on-pump group.
  • RBC deformability was impaired during on-pump surgery, and platelet aggregation reduction was more pronounced.

Conclusions:

  • Off-pump CABG results in less alteration of rheological parameters and reduced mechanical damage to red blood cells.
  • The off-pump technique appears to be hemodynamically more favorable than the on-pump approach.