Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY
Stefan H Hohnloser1, Jonas Oldgren, Sean Yang
1Division of Clinical Electrophysiology, J.W. Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany. Hohnloser@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Dabigatran showed a nonsignificant increase in myocardial infarction (MI) risk compared to warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients. However, other ischemic events were not elevated, and dabigatran
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) carries a modest risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and other ischemic events.
- Understanding the comparative safety of anticoagulants in AF is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the rates of MI and other myocardial ischemic events between dabigatran and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.
- To evaluate the net clinical benefit and treatment effects of dabigatran versus warfarin.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) study.
- Comparison of annual event rates for MI, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, cardiac death, and a composite of these events.
- Assessment of prespecified "net clinical benefit" outcomes including all strokes, systemic embolism, MI, pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death.
Main Results:
- Annual MI rates were 0.82% with dabigatran 110 mg, 0.81% with dabigatran 150 mg, and 0.64% with warfarin (nonsignificant increase with dabigatran).
- Composite rates of MI, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, and cardiac death were similar between dabigatran (3.16%-3.33%) and warfarin (3.41%).
- Net clinical benefit events occurred at 7.34% (dabigatran 110 mg), 7.11% (dabigatran 150 mg), and 7.91% (warfarin) per year, with a significant benefit for dabigatran 150 mg.
Conclusions:
- Dabigatran demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in MI risk but did not increase other myocardial ischemic events compared to warfarin.
- Treatment effects were consistent across patient subgroups with or without a history of MI or coronary artery disease.
- Dabigatran, particularly at 150 mg BID, showed a favorable net clinical benefit profile in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

