Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
Published on: March 17, 2019
An evaluation and comparison of time-out procedures with and without release contingencies
Jeanne M Donaldson1, Timothy R Vollmer
1University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA. vollmera@ufl.edu
Insights
Both fixed-duration and release contingency time-out effectively reduced problem behavior in young children. Problem behaviors within time-out did not predict behaviors outside time-out for either procedure.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Child Psychology
- Applied Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Time-out is a common behavioral intervention.
- A release contingency is often recommended for time-out procedures.
- This involves delaying the end of time-out until a specific period of no problem behavior occurs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of fixed-duration time-out versus release contingency time-out.
- To examine the impact of these procedures on problem behavior in young children.
Main Methods:
- A reversal and multielement design was employed.
- Four children aged 3-4 years participated.
- Both fixed-duration and release contingency time-out procedures were implemented.
Main Results:
- Both time-out procedures effectively reduced problem behavior outside of time-out.
- Problem behavior occurred during time-out in both conditions.
- Problem behavior during time-out was not a predictor of problem behavior outside of time-out.
Conclusions:
- Both fixed-duration and release contingency time-out are effective in reducing problem behavior.
- The presence of problem behavior during time-out does not necessarily predict future problem behavior.
- Clinical recommendations for time-out procedures may need further refinement.
Abstract:
A common recommendation for implementing time-out procedures is to include a release contingency such that the individual is not allowed to leave time-out until no problem behavior has occurred for a specific amount of time (e.g, 30 s). We compared a fixed-duration time-out procedure to a release contingency time-out procedure with 4 young children (3- and 4-year-olds) using a reversal and multielement design. Results demonstrated that both time-out procedures were effective at reducing problem behavior outside time-out, problem behavior occurred in time-out during both procedures, and problem behavior in time-out was not predictive of problem behavior outside time-out.
More Related Videos
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Contingency Table
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test