Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Assessing the quality of evidence for preterm labor tocolytic trials
David M Haas1, Page Kirkpatrick, Jennifer J McIntosh
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. dahaas@iupui.edu
Objective:
To assess the quality of tocolysis randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to determine trial factors contributing to better quality evidence.
Methods:
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched for terms "preterm labor," "tocolytic" or "obstetric labor, premature" up to 1 August 2009.Data regarding study design, characteristics, number of participants and outcomes reported were extracted by at least two review authors. Study quality was assigned using the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook methodology and categories. Trends for quality over time, the impact of study size and the individual drugs compared were analyzed for impact on overall quality of trials.
Results:
Of the 3197 titles initially identified, 89 RCTs of tocolytic therapy were reviewed. Of the six quality areas, 10 (11.2%) trials satisfied all areas, while only one trial (1.1%) met one area. The mean number of adequate areas was 4.1 ± 1.2. Overall, 52 (58.4%) of the trials achieved high-quality categorization. Controlling for multiple trial factors, the trial continent and decade were significant predictors of overall trial quality.
Conclusion:
The majority of tocolysis RCTs are of high quality. Larger trials, more recent trials and placebo-controlled trials were associated with higher quality scores.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials: Overview