Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological Sex Is Binary and Rooted in Anisogamy.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

Functional genomics reveals key gene families and molecular pathways for extreme cold survival in the khapra beetle.

BMC biology·2026
Same author

The effects of sexual selection on functional and molecular reproductive divergence during experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Evolution letters·2026
Same author

Lifespan-extending downregulation of insulin signalling reduces germline mutation load.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Diverging transposon activity among polar bear sub-populations inhabiting different climate zones.

Mobile DNA·2025
Same author

Evolutionary trade-offs between intergenerational and transgenerational fitness effects.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Manipulation of Ploidy in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:54

Manipulation of Ploidy in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: March 15, 2018

Ploidally antagonistic selection maintains stable genetic polymorphism.

Simone Immler1, Göran Arnqvist, Sarah Perin Otto

  • 1Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. simone.immler@ebc.uu.se

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|January 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Opposing selection during different life stages (diploid and haploid) can maintain genetic diversity. Negative interactions between ploidy and sex-specific selection are crucial for preserving genetic variation.

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Manipulation of Ploidy in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:54

Manipulation of Ploidy in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: March 15, 2018

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genetics
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Maintaining genetic variation despite natural selection is a central problem in evolutionary biology.
  • Biphasic life cycles with distinct diploid and haploid stages are common in eukaryotes.
  • Opposing selection pressures in haploid and diploid phases, or between sexes, may preserve genetic diversity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how ploidy-antagonistic and sex-specific selection maintain stable genetic polymorphisms.
  • To examine the influence of allele location (autosomal or sex-linked) on polymorphism maintenance.
  • To identify conditions favoring the persistence of genetic variation in biphasic life cycles.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of selection pressures across diploid and haploid life stages.
  • Analysis of autosomal, X-linked, and Y-linked gene dynamics.
  • Simulation of allele frequency changes under various selection scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The most favorable conditions for polymorphism maintenance involve negative ploidy-by-sex interactions.
  • Stronger selection in female diploids coupled with weaker selection in female haploids promotes variation.
  • Ploidy-by-sex interactions drive differences in allele frequencies between sexes.
  • Ploidaly antagonistic selection maintains polymorphism for autosomal and X-linked genes, but not Y-linked genes.

Conclusions:

  • Opposing selection across ploidy levels and sexes can effectively maintain genetic variation.
  • Allele location significantly impacts the potential for polymorphism maintenance.
  • The findings have implications for understanding evolutionary dynamics in organisms with biphasic life cycles.