Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography
Published on: July 26, 2019
Finding the missing stimulus mismatch negativity (MMN): emitted MMN to violations of an auditory gestalt
1Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, USA. dean_salisbury@hms.harvard.edu
Abstract:
Deviations from repetitive auditory stimuli evoke a mismatch negativity (MMN). Counterintuitively, omissions of repetitive stimuli do not. Violations of patterns reflecting complex rules also evoke MMN. To detect a MMN to missing stimuli, we developed an auditory gestalt task using one stimulus. Groups of six pips (50 ms duration, 330 ms stimulus onset asynchrony [SOA], 400 trials), were presented with an intertrial interval (ITI) of 750 ms while subjects (n=16) watched a silent video. Occasional deviant groups had missing 4th or 6th tones (50 trials each). Missing stimuli evoked a MMN (p<.05). The missing 4th (-0.8 µV, p<.01) and the missing 6th stimuli (-1.1 µV, p<.05) were more negative than standard 6th stimuli (0.3 µV). MMN can be elicited by a missing stimulus at long SOAs by violation of a gestalt grouping rule. Patterned stimuli appear more sensitive to omissions and ITI than homogenous streams.
Insights
Auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) can be detected even when a sound is omitted, not just when it deviates. This study shows missing sounds in patterned auditory stimuli elicit MMN, challenging previous assumptions.
Area of Science:
- Auditory neuroscience
- Cognitive psychology
- Electroencephalography (EEG)
Background:
- Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an electrophysiological response to auditory deviations.
- Traditionally, MMN is not observed for omitted stimuli.
- Complex rule violations can elicit MMN.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if omitted auditory stimuli can elicit MMN.
- To explore the role of auditory gestalt perception in MMN.
- To test MMN generation with missing elements in patterned stimuli.
Main Methods:
- An auditory gestalt task was designed using groups of six pips with a 330 ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA).
- Participants (n=16) viewed silent videos during stimulus presentation.
- Deviant trials featured omissions of the 4th or 6th pip, while standard trials had all six pips.
Main Results:
- A significant MMN was evoked by the omission of stimuli (p<.05).
- Missing 4th (-0.8 µV) and 6th (-1.1 µV) pips elicited more negative MMN than standard 6th pips (0.3 µV).
- This suggests MMN can be elicited by omissions in patterned auditory sequences.
Conclusions:
- MMN can be elicited by missing auditory stimuli, particularly within patterned sequences violating gestalt rules.
- Long SOAs and pattern violations are key factors in eliciting MMN to omissions.
- Patterned stimuli are more sensitive to omissions and intertrial interval variations than homogenous streams.
