Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pollination and Flower Structure02:40

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.
Microbial Interactions: Parasitism01:22

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism

Parasitism is a form of microbial interaction in which parasitic microbes exploit a host organism for nutrients and shelter, often at the host's expense. Unlike mutualistic relationships, where both organisms benefit, parasitism benefits only the parasite and harms the host.Classification of ParasitesMicrobial parasites are broadly classified based on their location relative to the host.Ectoparasites remain on the host’s surface, such as the skin or outer tissues, drawing nutrients...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different population dynamics in the supplementary motor area and motor cortex during reaching.

Nature communications·2018
Same author

Neural data science: accelerating the experiment-analysis-theory cycle in large-scale neuroscience.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2018
Same author

No evidence for change in oviposition behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) after widespread adoption of transgenic insecticidal cotton.

Bulletin of entomological research·2012
Same author

Projected consumption patterns for a stationary population.

Population studies·2011
Same author

Discrepancy between antennal and behavioral responses for enantiomers of alpha-pinene: electrophysiology and behavior of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera).

Journal of chemical ecology·2004
Same author

Minimum instructional and program-specific administrative costs of educating residents in internal medicine.

Archives of internal medicine·2001
Same journal

From head to tail: does habitat use drive morphological variation in snakes?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same journal

Plant hormone manipulation impacts salt spray tolerance, which preempts herbivory as a driver of local adaptation in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same journal

Influence of the resource acquisition-allocation Y-model's parameters on the detection of phenotypic trade-offs.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same journal

Chromosomal inversions may assist acute salinity and temperature adaptation in Atlantic cod eggs.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same journal

Quantitative genetics of shy-bold behaviour and plastic response to novel predator cues in the cherry shrimp, Neocaridina davidi.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same journal

Do interactions between different Selfish Genetic Elements matter?

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences
12:14

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Can mechanism help explain insect host choice?

J P Cunningham1

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. p.cunningham@uq.edu.au

Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|January 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Insect host selection may be limited by the olfactory mechanism. This study proposes that inherent costs in odour processing could explain seemingly poor plant choices, revealing adaptive strategies in insect evolution.

More Related Videos

A Wind Tunnel for Odor Mediated Insect Behavioural Assays
05:25

A Wind Tunnel for Odor Mediated Insect Behavioural Assays

Published on: November 30, 2018

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants
06:13

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants

Published on: February 14, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences
12:14

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

A Wind Tunnel for Odor Mediated Insect Behavioural Assays
05:25

A Wind Tunnel for Odor Mediated Insect Behavioural Assays

Published on: November 30, 2018

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants
06:13

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants

Published on: February 14, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Insect behavior and evolution
  • Neuroethology
  • Olfactory processing

Background:

  • Evolutionary theory posits insect egg-laying choices align with offspring fitness.
  • Empirical studies often show a disconnect between host plant choice and offspring survival.
  • Missing factors like predation or learning are typically assumed to explain this discrepancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative theory for insect host selection: fitness costs within the olfactory mechanism.
  • To explain insect olfactory processing and its governing rules to a broader scientific audience.
  • To re-evaluate insect behavior and evolution studies through a mechanistic lens.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current knowledge on insect antennal lobe odour processing.
  • Development of a schematic to illustrate olfactory mechanism workings.
  • Exploration of host/non-host odour perception governed by processing rules (algorithm).

Main Results:

  • A mechanistic view suggests interrelated plant odour perception.
  • Seemingly poor host plant choices can be adaptive within this framework.
  • The olfactory mechanism's inherent costs can constrain host selection evolution.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the olfactory mechanism provides a new perspective on insect host selection.
  • This mechanistic approach can reconcile theoretical predictions with empirical observations.
  • It offers a framework for reinterpreting insect behavior and evolutionary studies.