Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
The costs of changing an intended action: movement planning, but not execution, interferes with verbal working memory
M A Spiegel1, D Koester, M Weigelt
1Neurocognition and Action - Biomechanics Research Group, Bielefeld University, Germany; Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC), Bielefeld University, Germany. marnie ann.spiegel@uni-bielefeld.de
Abstract:
How much cognitive effort does it take to change a movement plan? In previous studies, it has been shown that humans plan and represent actions in advance, but it remains unclear whether or not action planning and verbal working memory share cognitive resources. Using a novel experimental paradigm, we combined in two experiments a grasp-to-place task with a verbal working memory task. Participants planned a placing movement toward one of two target positions and subsequently encoded and maintained visually presented letters. Both experiments revealed that re-planning the intended action reduced letter recall performance; execution time, however, was not influenced by action modifications. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the action's interference with verbal working memory arose during the planning rather than the execution phase of the movement. Together, our results strongly suggest that movement planning and verbal working memory share common cognitive resources.
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Schemas
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
