Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent Advances in Quinoline Synthesis: Sustainable Catalytic Strategies and Emerging Methodologies.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Interpretable abstractions of artificial neural networks predict behavior and neural activity during human information gathering.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Learning shapes neural geometry in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Sex differences in task engagement and lapse rate during reward learning.

Oxford open neuroscience·2026
Same author

Modelling discrete states and long-term dynamics in functional brain networks.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Canonical Hidden Markov Model Networks for studying M/EEG.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Glycosylation in Alzheimer's disease.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Neuropixels harness the light.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Clarity in clearance pathways.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hypothalamic specification in a dish.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: A route for cerebrospinal fluid flow through leptomeningeal arterial-venous overlaps enables macromolecule and fluid shunting.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Prefrontal engrams of long-term fear memory perpetuate pain perception.

Nature neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Mechanisms underlying cortical activity during value-guided choice.

Laurence T Hunt1, Nils Kolling, Alireza Soltani

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK. lhunt@fmrib.ox.ac.uk

Nature Neuroscience
|January 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neural activity in the brain represents value during decision-making. This study reveals specific time-varying signals in parietal and prefrontal cortex crucial for value comparison, distinguishing computational roles in choice.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Neuroscience

Background:

  • Neural activity throughout the brain correlates with the value of options during choice.
  • It remains unclear if these neural representations are fundamental to value comparison or covarying computations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the computational mechanisms underlying value comparison in neural networks.
  • To differentiate between neural signals essential for value comparison and those associated with other computations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a biophysically plausible network model to simulate value-to-choice transformations.
  • Tested model predictions using magnetoencephalography (MEG) data from human subjects making value-guided decisions.

Main Results:

  • The network model generated characteristic time-varying signals indicative of value comparison.
  • Observed close correspondence between model predictions and neural signals in human parietal and prefrontal cortex.
  • Identified specific neural signals reflecting the computational process of value comparison.

Conclusions:

  • Provides a mechanistic explanation for neural signals observed during value-guided choice.
  • Offers a method to distinguish the computational roles of brain regions involved in value-related activity.
  • Highlights the importance of specific neural dynamics in value comparison.