Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

07:44
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
Objectively assessing treadmill walking during the second and third pregnancy trimesters.
Jennifer M DiNallo1, Danielle Symons Downs, Guy Le Masurier
1Dept of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Journal of Physical Activity & Health
|January 11, 2012
Summary
Physical changes during pregnancy affect activity monitor accuracy. Controlling for body girth and monitor tilt improves measurement validity for pregnant women engaging in physical activity.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Exercise Science
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) during pregnancy is crucial for promoting health and quantifying intervention effects.
- Current PA measurement methods require refinement for the pregnant population.
- Understanding how pregnancy-related physiological changes influence PA monitor output is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the output of PA monitors (Actigraph, NL1000, Yamax) during a controlled treadmill walking protocol in pregnant women.
- To assess changes in monitor output between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation.
- To determine if physiological changes during pregnancy affect PA monitor readings.
Main Methods:
- Forty-three pregnant women participated, wearing an Actigraph accelerometer, NL1000, and Yamax pedometer.
- Participants completed a 20-minute treadmill walking test at four different speeds (54, 67, 80, 94 m·min⁻¹).
- Measurements were taken at 20 and 32 weeks of gestation.
Main Results:
- Actigraph and NL1000 measures of PA (counts/minute, minutes of moderate-vigorous PA, steps) and Yamax steps decreased from 20 to 32 weeks gestation.
- Body girth circumference and activity monitor tilt increased significantly between the two measurement points.
- After controlling for body girth and monitor tilt, no significant differences in PA monitor outcomes were observed between 20 and 32 weeks gestation.
Conclusions:
- Physiological changes during pregnancy, such as increased body girth and monitor tilt, can impact PA monitor readings in controlled environments.
- Statistical adjustment for changes in body girth and monitor tilt may enhance the accuracy of activity monitors for pregnant women.
- Further research is needed to validate PA measurement tools for diverse pregnant populations.

