Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Improvement of Bacillus subtilis Spore Enumeration and Label Analysis in Flow Cytometry
Published on: June 30, 2023
Comparison of methods for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in water
Valéria Christina Amstalden Junqueira1, Romeu Cantúsio Neto, Neusely da Silva
1Food Technology Institute, ITAL. Avenida Brasil, Jardim Chapadão, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
Four methods for enumerating Clostridium perfringens spores in water were evaluated: (1) the IMM (Iron Milk Medium) method (MPN); (2) the LS (Lactose Sulfite Broth) method (MPN); (3) the m-CP (membrane filtration Clostridium perfringens Agar) method (membrane filtration); and (4) the TSC (Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine Agar) method (membrane filtration). The performance of these methods was compared with that of the DRCM (Differential Reinforced Clostridium Medium) method (MPN) as adopted by CETESB (Brazil's Environmental Sanitation Technology Company) for the analysis of C. perfringens spores in water. Statistical analysis was performed according to ISO 17994:2004 (Water Quality - Criteria for Establishing Equivalence between Microbiological Methods). The LS, m-CP, and TSC methods were considered not equivalent to the DRCM method, as they gave significantly lower results. The IMM showed inconclusive results and, according to ISO 17994:2004, analysis of a greater number of samples is needed to draw definitive conclusions comparing IMM and DRCM.
Insights
Comparing water testing methods for Clostridium perfringens spores, the Lactose Sulfite (LS), m-CP, and Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine (TSC) methods yielded significantly lower results than the standard Differential Reinforced Clostridium Medium (DRCM) method.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Environmental Science
- Water Quality Analysis
Background:
- Accurate enumeration of Clostridium perfringens spores in water is crucial for assessing water safety and treatment efficacy.
- Several microbiological methods exist for C. perfringens spore detection, but their comparative performance requires rigorous evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of four different methods (IMM, LS, m-CP, TSC) for enumerating Clostridium perfringens spores in water.
- To determine the equivalence of these methods against the standard Differential Reinforced Clostridium Medium (DRCM) method used by CETESB.
Main Methods:
- Four methods were evaluated: Iron Milk Medium (IMM) (MPN), Lactose Sulfite Broth (LS) (MPN), m-CP (membrane filtration), and TSC (membrane filtration).
- Performance comparison was conducted against the Differential Reinforced Clostridium Medium (DRCM) (MPN) method.
- Statistical analysis followed ISO 17994:2004 guidelines for establishing equivalence between microbiological methods.
Main Results:
- The LS, m-CP, and TSC methods yielded significantly lower results compared to the DRCM method, indicating non-equivalence.
- The IMM method produced inconclusive results, necessitating further analysis with a larger sample size to establish equivalence with DRCM.
Conclusions:
- The LS, m-CP, and TSC methods are not equivalent to the DRCM method for enumerating C. perfringens spores in water due to consistently lower counts.
- Further research is required to validate the IMM method's performance and its equivalence to the DRCM standard.
More Related Videos
12:11A Modified EPA Method 1623 that Uses Tangential Flow Hollow-fiber Ultrafiltration and Heat Dissociation Steps to Detect Waterborne Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp.
Published on: July 9, 2012
08:00Enrichment and Detection of Clostridium perfringens Toxinotypes in Retail Food Samples
Published on: October 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods to Assess Microbial Populations
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures
Special Staining Techniques