Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same author

More Than a Material: Social Interpretation Shapes the Hedonic Evaluation of Human Hand Touch.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Unmasking deceptive decisions in a two-player competitive game: Integrating ERPs, spectral-perturbation signatures, and interpretable neural-network decoding.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Charting Decodability of Dynamic Facial Expressions in Young and Old Adults: Similarities and Differences.

Experimental neurobiology·2025
Same author

Seeing What Matters: Attentional (MIS-) Alignment between Humans and AI in VR-Simulated Prediction of Driving Accidents.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

Serial exploration of faces: comparing vision and touch.

Lisa Dopjans1, Heinrich H Bülthoff, Christian Wallraven

  • 1Department of Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany. lisa.dopjans@tuebingen.mpg.de

Journal of Vision
|January 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Visual and haptic face recognition performance became equal when vision was restricted to serial encoding, similar to touch. This suggests modality-specific encoding strategies explain performance differences in face recognition.

More Related Videos

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2026

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Haptic face recognition is surprisingly effective but generally less accurate than visual recognition.
  • A potential reason for this performance gap is the difference in encoding strategies: holistic for vision and serial for haptics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether modality-specific encoding strategies underlie performance differences in visual and haptic face recognition.
  • To test the hypothesis that serial encoding in vision can equalize face recognition performance with haptics.

Main Methods:

  • A novel gaze-restricted display was used to limit the visual field, promoting serial encoding in vision.
  • Haptic and visual face recognition were compared under unrestricted, gaze-restricted, and haptic conditions.
  • The face inversion paradigm assessed changes in processing strategies (featural vs. holistic).

Main Results:

  • Face recognition performance was equivalent between haptic and gaze-restricted visual exploration.
  • Gaze restriction in vision induced a shift from holistic to featural processing, mirroring haptic strategies.
  • Unrestricted visual recognition remained superior, utilizing holistic processing.

Conclusions:

  • Modality-specific encoding strategies significantly impact face recognition performance.
  • Serial encoding, promoted in vision via gaze restriction, leads to performance levels comparable to haptic recognition.
  • Differences in visual versus haptic face recognition performance are attributable to distinct encoding mechanisms rather than inherent modality limitations.