Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Isolation, In Vitro Expansion, and Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Mouse Epididymal Adipose Tissue
Published on: January 12, 2024
Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase
Peter Connick1, Madhan Kolappan, Charles Crawley
1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Background:
More than half of patients with multiple sclerosis have progressive disease characterised by accumulating disability. The absence of treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis represents a major unmet clinical need. On the basis of evidence that mesenchymal stem cells have a beneficial effect in acute and chronic animal models of multiple sclerosis, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of these cells as a potential neuroprotective treatment for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Methods:
Patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis involving the visual pathways (expanded disability status score 5·5-6·5) were recruited from the East Anglia and north London regions of the UK. Participants received intravenous infusion of autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in this open-label study. Our primary objective was to assess feasibility and safety; we compared adverse events from up to 20 months before treatment until up to 10 months after the infusion. As a secondary objective, we chose efficacy outcomes to assess the anterior visual pathway as a model of wider disease. Masked endpoint analyses was used for electrophysiological and selected imaging outcomes. We used piecewise linear mixed models to assess the change in gradients over time at the point of intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00395200.
Findings:
We isolated, expanded, characterised, and administered mesenchymal stem cells in ten patients. The mean dose was 1·6×10(6) cells per kg bodyweight (range 1·1-2·0). One patient developed a transient rash shortly after treatment; two patients had self-limiting bacterial infections 3-4 weeks after treatment. We did not identify any serious adverse events. We noted improvement after treatment in visual acuity (difference in monthly rates of change -0·02 logMAR units, 95% CI -0·03 to -0·01; p=0·003) and visual evoked response latency (-1·33 ms, -2·44 to -0·21; p=0·020), with an increase in optic nerve area (difference in monthly rates of change 0·13 mm(2), 0·04 to 0·22; p=0·006). We did not identify any significant effects on colour vision, visual fields, macular volume, retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, or optic nerve magnetisation transfer ratio.
Interpretation:
Autologous mesenchymal stem cells were safely given to patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in our study. The evidence of structural, functional, and physiological improvement after treatment in some visual endpoints is suggestive of neuroprotection.
Funding:
Medical Research Council, Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Evelyn Trust, NHS National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge and UCLH Biomedical Research Centres, Wellcome Trust, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Foundation, and Sir David and Isobel Walker Trust.
Insights
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy shows promise for progressive multiple sclerosis. This study found autologous mesenchymal stem cells were safe and suggested neuroprotection in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Regenerative Medicine
- Immunology
Background:
- Progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) leads to accumulating disability, with no current treatments available.
- Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have demonstrated therapeutic potential in animal models of MS.
- This study investigated MSCs as a potential neuroprotective treatment for secondary progressive MS (SPMS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of autologous bone-marrow-derived MSCs in patients with SPMS.
- To evaluate MSCs as a potential neuroprotective therapy for progressive neurological disease.
- To explore the feasibility of MSC administration in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Ten patients with SPMS received intravenous infusions of autologous bone-marrow-derived MSCs.
- The study focused on the anterior visual pathway as a model for disease assessment.
- Safety was monitored by comparing adverse events before and after treatment; efficacy was assessed using electrophysiological and imaging outcomes.
Main Results:
- Autologous MSCs were safely administered to all ten patients.
- No serious adverse events were reported; only mild, self-limiting side effects were observed.
- Improvements were noted in visual acuity, visual evoked response latency, and optic nerve area, suggesting potential neuroprotection.
Conclusions:
- Autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy is safe for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
- The observed improvements in visual endpoints suggest a potential neuroprotective effect of MSCs.
- Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and explore broader applications in MS treatment.
